My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02726
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2700
>
pf_02726
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:06:56 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 12:38:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2726
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Status
APPROVED
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />?~~ u) <br /> <br />DAHLGREN <br />SHARD LOW <br />AND. UBAN <br /> <br />~ )(~: <br /> <br /> <br />lM <br />v.Ailuf <br /> <br />....- <br /> <br />rNCOR PO II.ATr 0 <br /> <br />CONSULTING PLANNERS <br />LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS <br /> <br />300 FIRST AVENUE NORTH <br />SUITE 210 <br />MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 <br />612 339 ,3300 <br /> <br />15 October 1993 <br /> <br />Albert W. Grauel <br />2736 Matilda Street <br />Roseville, Minnesota, 55113-2417 <br /> <br />Margot B. & Steven Roberts <br />2051 Somero Rd. <br />El y, Minnesota, 55731 <br /> <br />Peter Gryskewicz <br />493 Terrace Drive <br />Roseville, Minnesota 55113-2417 <br /> <br />RE: Update of Planning Process for Rosevil1e School District Property, Questions Regarding <br />Your Interest in Developing At This Time <br /> <br />Dear Neighboring Property Owners: <br /> <br />The Roseville School Board has asked me to contact you to update you regarding the overall <br />planning process, and to address some important questions that need to be resolved prior to the <br />preparation of the PUD application. After you have reviewed this letter, I would appreciate it if you <br />would give me a call and either discuss these questions then or arrange to meet and discuss them. <br /> <br />~ <br />l <br /> <br /> <br />(" <br /> <br />Since the last informational meeting with the community in July, we have been preparing responses <br />to the major questions raised by surrounding residents. I have also been in contact with a number of <br />interested developers. <br /> <br />Although there were several questions raised in the community meetings, several focused on future <br />traffic. To respond to these questions, we suggested and the Board agreed to retain <br />Short-Elliot-Hendrickson to prepare a traffic study. I have attached a photocopy of that study for <br />your review. <br /> <br />That study was presented to the Board on September 21, along with my recommendation that they <br />proceed with the PUD process with Alternative Concept B. That concept has been the best received <br />by the members of the Roseville City Council who have expressed an opinion and also by far the <br />most support from the development community. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.