Laserfiche WebLink
671 <br />Chair Stenlund and members thanked Mr. Schwartz for providing the information <br />672 <br />and recognized the diversity of the Public Works Department and related role for <br />673 <br />the PWETC. <br />674 <br />675 <br />At the request of Member Seigler, Mr. Schwartz advised that the data was <br />676 <br />available to the public as requested, including requests of commissioners. <br />677 <br />678 <br />If interested, staff encouraged members to contact them to see a lining project live <br />679 <br />and in operation, as there were several underway at this time. <br />680 <br />681 9. <br />Possible Items for Next Meeting — July 29, 201 <br />682 <br />• Community Solar Issues, including reviewingo er community ordinances <br />683 <br />(e.g. City of Rosemount) to keep on track to facilitate possible 2015 City <br />684 <br />participation in community solar issues and their role and what is best suited <br />685 <br />for the City of Roseville. <br />686 <br />• Frozen Pipe Alternatives as a ptOority topic to provide recommendations to the <br />687 <br />City Council before needed this fall in anticipation of the winter season. <br />688 <br />• Pathway Priorities and Rankings <br />689 <br />At the request of Member Gjerdingen, staff advised that they woul review <br />690 <br />the previous resolution adopted by the PWETC and presented to the City <br />691 <br />Council and whether additional work was needed at this time. However, Mr. <br />692 <br />Schwartz noted that this was an exceptionally busy time of year for staff to <br />693 <br />focus on research given the number of construction projects it needed to <br />694 <br />monitor and inspect, but offered to research whether 4 not any additional <br />695 <br />work was needed on pathway issues. <br />696 <br />• Bicycling/Commercial Districts, with Chair Stenlund advising that additional <br />697 <br />education was needed for the PWETC to better understand the situation prior <br />698 <br />to any additional meeting discussions. Member Gjerdingen expressed interest <br />699 <br />in reviewing other cities with district mapping as part of that educational <br />700 <br />piece. <br />701 <br />702 <br />r. Culver a ised that staff could briefly explore current State Statute and <br />703 <br />t the City was bound to along with anything in current City Code that <br />704 <br />m ersede Statute or anything additional needed. Mr. Culver advised that <br />705 <br />the i ation could be provided to the PWETC for their feedback at that <br />706 <br />time. <br />707 <br />708 <br />• Mr. Schwartz noted past discussions about having Mr. Johnson provide <br />709 <br />information on rain gardens and BMP's, and current practices. <br />710 <br />711 <br />Chair Stenlund suggested a representative from Capitol Region Watershed <br />712 <br />District as another resource for that discussion as well. <br />713 <br />714 <br />• Chair Stenlund requested an update on railroad noise issues in Little Canada, <br />715 <br />and any communication on where the signalization efforts are at. <br />716 <br />Page 16 of 18 <br />