My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02736
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2700
>
pf_02736
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:08:10 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 12:39:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2736
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Address
1061 ROSELAWN AVE
Applicant
MASTERPIECE HOMES/GORDY HOW
PIN
142923220003
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />satisfied on a cash in lieu ofjand basis. The fonnula for this contribution is based on $400.00 per <br />" townhome unit. <br /> <br />Vehicle Traffic <br /> <br />The planned unit development is proposing 16 townhome units on this site, creating a gross <br />project density of 5 units per acre, Staff estimates that there will be between 30-40 residents in <br />this new subdivision. Using ITE traffic standards of 5 vehicle trips per townhouse unit per day, <br />the new subdivision would generate approximately 80 vehicle trips per day. The majority of this <br />traffic would be moving onto Lexington Avenue, through the controlled intersection at Roselawn. <br /> <br />City Code requires two parking spaces per townhouse unit. One covered and one uncovered. <br />With this design, the developer is proposing a 2-car garage for each unit with parking in tront of <br />the unit for two additional cars. With the 26 foot wide roadway, the private street is not wide <br />enough for street parking, To accomplish parking on one side of the street, it would need to be <br />widened to a 28 foot roadway. <br /> <br />As the private street connects with Oxford and Draper on the proposed site plan, it does so <br />through 30 feet of right-of-way dedicated for the once proposed connection of Oxford Street <br />through to Roselawn. This connection is not needed and the right-of-way can be vacated to the <br />adjacent property owners as a part of this planned unit development review process. Mr. Michael <br />Christofore, the neighbor to the east on Draper Avenue, has indicated an interest in having a <br />portion of this right-of-way vacated to him, <br /> <br />3, Engineering staff' has reviewed this proposal and have made the following <br />recommendations: <br /> <br />a, A contribution to the sidewalk fund will be required for the Roselawn Avenue <br />frontage, <br />b, A curb cut will be required at Oxford Street and will need to be constructed to <br />Roseville standards. <br />c. The preliminary utility design and storm water ponding have been reviewed by <br />Engineering staff and have been found to meet City standards and requirements, <br />Staff will need to review final Engineering plans and specifications prior to final <br />stage approval. <br /> <br />LandsC3pe Plan <br /> <br />The landscape plan prepared for the proposed Rose Villa subdivision is based on a strong <br />peripheral planting plan showing year round interest combined with foundation pJantings for each <br />unit. To provide additional screening, staff'has suggested to the developer that additional <br />benning, along th~ ,north prciperty line be incorporated into the grading plan. This would <br />strengthen the separation between Rose Villa and the existing single family neighbors to the north. <br />The plantings along Roselawn,Avenue, in combination with the benning, help screen and break up <br />, the building massing along Rosela;wn. <br /> <br />4. The Planning Commission, at the June 14, 1995 meeting, recommended approval of <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.