Laserfiche WebLink
<br />t. '...., <br /> <br />With this desi~ the developer is proposing a 2wcar garage for each unit with parking in front of <br />the unit for two additional cars, With the 26 foot wide roadway, the private street is not wide <br />enough for street parking. To accomplish parking on one side of the street, it would need to be <br />widened to a 28 foot roadway. <br /> <br />As the private street connects with Oxford and Draper on the proposed site plan, it does so <br />through 30 feet ofrightwofwway dedicated for the once proposed connection of Oxford Street <br />through to Roselawn, This connection is not needed and the rightwof-way can be vacated to the <br />adjacent property owners as a part oftrus planned unit development review process. Mr. Michael <br />Christofore, the neighbor to the east on Draper Avenue, has indicated an interest in having a <br />portion of this rightwofwway vacated to him. <br /> <br />3. Engineering staff has reviewed this proposal and have made the following <br />recommendations: <br /> <br />a. A contribution to the sidewalk fund will be required for the Roselawn Avenue <br />frontage. <br />b. A curb cut witt be required at Oxford Street and will need to be constructed to <br />Roseville standards. <br />c. The preliminary utility design and storm water ponding have been reviewed by <br />Engineering staff and have been found to meet City standards and requirements. <br />Staff will need to review final Engineering plans and specifications prior to final <br />stage approval. <br /> <br />Landscape Plan <br /> <br />The landscape plan prepared for the proposed Rose Villa subdivision is based on a strong <br />peripheral planting plan showing year round interest combined with foundation plantings for each <br />unit. To provide additional screening, staff has suggested to the developer that additional <br />berming behind the proposed stonn ponding area be incorporated into the 'grading plan. This <br />would strengthen the separation between Rose Villa and the existing single family neighbors to <br />the north. The plantings along Roselawn Avenue, in combination with the berming, help screen <br />and break up the building massing along Roselawn. <br /> <br />4. The Planning Commission, at the June 14, 1995 meeting, recommended approval of <br />Masterpiece Homes, Inc. request to rezone the 3.19 acres from Rl to Residential <br />Planned Unit Development (PUD) consisting of 16 townhomes, approval of the <br />preliminary plat for the site including vacated right-oC-way, and approval of the <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment from low..density residential to mediumwdensity <br />residential subject to the 3 engineering tonditions within the staff report, and <br />requested that the staff review uniformity and design alternatives for the site. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendations: <br /> <br />1. The Whal~y property has been designated as low density residential in the City's <br />Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan since 1979. The planned unit development <br />application is proposing 16 single level townhome units creating a gross project density of <br /> <br />3 <br />