Laserfiche WebLink
■ Commissioners inquired into whether the lease fees for projects like this have an index that adjusts <br />fees over time. <br />■ Commissioners wondered about how this proposal, on a hockey light pole fits into the Master Plan <br />process. <br />■ Commissioners also asked about where the revenues for a lease on park land go to. <br />■ Commissioners asked for the opportunity to comment on the proposal based on the <br />recommendations made at the upcoming Planning Commission meeting. <br />Commission Recommendation: Motion by Willmus, second by D. Holtz to recommend to the City <br />Council that the Clearwire proposal be approved as presented subject to the final determinate of the pole <br />location and if there is movement towards a co -location tower that it be brought back to the Commission for <br />a new review and recommendation. Motion passed unanimously. <br />7. PARKS AND RECREATION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN UPDATE <br />■ There is a major effort in the works to get out to everyone in the community for input and to share <br />information. <br />■ First Community Meeting is scheduled for Thursday, November 5, 2009 — everyone is invited to <br />attend and take part. <br />Commission Recommendation: Commissioners inquired into whether the Parks and Recreation Master <br />Plan questionnaire can be added to the website to be completed and submitted online. Staff will follow-up <br />with City communications staff to explore how this might be accomplished. <br />8. 2010 BUDGET UPDATE <br />Brokke reviewed the current status of the 2010 budget. Council and Department heads recently prioritized <br />the city-wide functions identified by Springsted through the cost allocation process. The process and <br />prioritization raised many questions by the Commission. <br />■ Commissioners asked where the revenues come into play. Revenue has not been accounted for <br />resulting in a misrepresentation of some program costs. <br />■ Commissioners commented that the process is not actually budgeting for outcomes. <br />■ Commissioners inquired into what information was used by the Council to set their priorities, the <br />priorities were questioned without knowing the background of programs and/or services. <br />■ In the opinion of some Commissioners, the process being used to set the 2010 budget is flawed. <br />■ Overall, the Commission showed and voiced frustration in the 2010 budget process. <br />■ Willmus asked Brokke to provide Commissioners with updates on agenda items dealing with the <br />2010 budget. <br />■ In conclusion, the Commission voiced concern that further reductions will result in reduced services <br />by a range of department employees. <br />9. DIRECTORS REPORT <br />Mid year budget reductions have resulted in an adjusted 2009 budget. When making the $117,000 <br />reduction to the Parks and Recreation budget staff worked hard to do it in a way that has the least <br />impact on the community. <br />o The reduction in the number of portable restrooms in the community has resulted in <br />increased comments by park users. <br />o Service to neighborhood rinks are scheduled to be decreased. Staff will track community <br />comments and look into the liability of opening a facility that is not supervised. <br />o Langton Lake Neighbors have commented on the state of the lily pads, budget reductions <br />have resulted in a delay in treating the plants. <br />Skating Center Bonding Project Update <br />o The OVAL marquee and scoreboard are being upgraded and replaced in the coming weeks <br />o Tarmac has been replaced <br />