My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-12-02_PR Comm Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2008
>
2008-12-02_PR Comm Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2014 11:54:01 AM
Creation date
7/18/2014 11:50:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ROSEVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION <br />MINUTES OF MEETING OF OCTOBER 7, 2008 <br />ROSEVILLE CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS — 6:30PM <br />PRESENT: Brodt Lenz, Hiber, Kendall, Pederson, Ristow, Stark, Willmus <br />ABSENT: Johnson, Kamrath, Kruzel (contacted staff prior to meeting) <br />STAFF: Brokke, Anfang <br />1. INTRODUCTIONS/ROLL CALL/PUBLIC COMMENT <br />None <br />2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —SEPTEMBER 2, 2008 MEETING <br />Commission Recommendation: Minutes for the September 2, 2008 meeting were approved unanimously. <br />3. UNITED PROPERTIES ASSISTED LIVING PROPOSAL <br />Willmus excused himself from the presentation and discussion. <br />Brokke briefed the Commission on a proposed additional development adjacent to the previously discussed <br />Applewood Pointe development at Langton Lake. The second development will include 93 Assisted Living <br />units. In the past United Properties has questioned the park dedication policy as it relates to Assisted Living <br />developments. United Properties believes assisted living residents will not be using park facilities and will <br />have minimal impact on the park. <br />Commission Discussion followed. <br />Commissioners around the table voiced an opinion on the assumption that because residents are <br />residing in an assisted living facility they will not use the park — Commissioners believe this to be an <br />incorrect assumption. Assisted Living Residents and their guests do use the park facilities and value <br />proximity to parks. <br />Commissioners voiced their opinion that there is no past precedence for special consideration in regards <br />to park dedication for multi unit housing structures. Commissioners are also concerned that any <br />deviation from the current park dedication policy would set a dangerous precedence. Commissioners <br />felt there is no reason to deviate from the policy recommended park dedication for this development. <br />Commissioner Stark asked if there is any benefit to considering land dedication for this project. <br />i. Brokke mentioned that a trail around the wet land is a possibility. <br />Commission Recommendation: <br />Motion by Ristow recommending accepting cash in lieu of land for the Assisted Living development at <br />Applewood Pointe near Langton Lake Park. Second by Hiber. Discussion followed focusing on whether there <br />should be consideration made toward the dedication of land in order to provide a connecting trail. Ristow <br />withdrew his original motion. <br />Motion made by Pederson to table the recommendation of park dedication, as long as it does not delay the <br />process, so that staff can provide the Commission more information on the land option. Second by Brodt Lenz. <br />Motion passed unanimously. <br />4. CONTINUED DISCUSSION ON MASTER PLAN RFP <br />Brokke presented the updated RFP which incorporated most of the Commissioner comments. <br />Commissioners recognized that the Master Plan discussion is the result of the Imagine Roseville 2025 findings <br />and the current significant interest by the community in maintaining the park and recreation system. The <br />Commission talked of the need to "remaster plan" the system — it is important to bring in today's community <br />members to add to the discussion. Commissioners also voiced their feelings on while the actual planning <br />process is important, the ability to implement the plan is essential. Implementation resources will be needed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.