My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0714
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0714
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2014 11:01:08 AM
Creation date
7/22/2014 10:55:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/14/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 14,2014 <br /> Page 10 <br /> 9. General Ordinances for Adoption <br /> 10. Presentations <br /> a. Joint Meeting with Ethics Commission and Consideration of Proposed <br /> Changes by the Ethics Commission to the Roseville Ethics Code <br /> Recognizing that only two members of the Ethics Commission were available to- <br /> night, City Manager Trudgeon noted that this was due to scheduling conflicts, and <br /> should not be taken as intent at offense by the City Council. <br /> Ethics Commission members present were Vice Chair Ben Lehman and Commis- <br /> sioners Nancy O'Brien. <br /> Vice Chair Lehman reviewed the recommendation of the Ethic Commission to the <br /> City Council for an amendment to the Roseville Ethics Code, as detailed in the <br /> RCA dated July 14, 2014; and followed several drafts to get to this final recom- <br /> mendation, subsequently approved by the City Attorney. <br /> Councilmember Willmus spoke in support of the recommendation, and opined <br /> that, based on his viewing of the Commission meeting discussions, the final rec- <br /> ommendation made sense given the context from which if originated, and provid- <br /> ed a step in the right direction. <br /> Commissioner O'Brien reviewed the origination of the problem with a complaint <br /> received and subsequently withdrawn in 2012, with no process in place for ad- <br /> dressing withdrawal, while recognizing the need for the City Council to determine <br /> if it was appropriate to be withdrawn. <br /> Councilmember McGehee questioned if there were provisions made if something <br /> was ongoing and while the complainant wanted to withdraw, there could be a pro- <br /> cess for the City Council to take action. <br /> City Attorney Mark Gaughan responded that, based on his recollection of discus- <br /> sions, he had intentionally worded the amendment to address that option, with the <br /> City Council able to carry on a review of an allegation of their own volition as <br /> applicable and no matter if and when a complainant may withdraw their com- <br /> plaint. <br /> Laliberte moved, McGehee seconded, adopted Resolution No. 11163 (Attachment <br /> B) entitled, "A Resolution Amending the Code of Ethics for Public Officials in <br /> the City of Roseville (Resolution No. 10905);" amending Section 5 of the Code <br /> regarding withdrawal of ethics complaints. <br /> Mayor Roe offered a friendly amendment, accepted by the makers of the motion, <br /> amending language of the first sentence of Section 5, Item H as follows: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.