My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0714
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0714
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2014 11:01:08 AM
Creation date
7/22/2014 10:55:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/14/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 14, 2014 <br /> Page 9 <br /> Based on the comments of Mr. Hess, Councilmember McGehee asked Mr. Heiser <br /> to respond; and asked if this requested hardware would work with that video pro- <br /> gram as well. <br /> Mayor Roe further questioned if the City wanted the Comcast package installed. <br /> Mr. Heiser clarified that video security was an enterprise-wide system, with every <br /> camera in the City connected to the City Hall's IP network, and all video images <br /> stored on services actually located in City Hall. When considering a network <br /> connection, Mr. Heiser advised that there was no more secure connection than <br /> that of the City, with all connections terminating at City Hall from each location <br /> rather than available on an internet system such as Comcast. Mr. Heiser noted re- <br /> cent instances over the last few months where security was breached through the <br /> Comcast system, and expressed his desire to balance City needs and security with <br /> services available through Comcast. For instance, Mr. Heiser noted that Villa <br /> Park was a long distance from City Hall, and Comcast may be the best and most <br /> cost-effective solution; while Rosebrook Park was very close in proximity to the <br /> city's fiber system, and therefore that may prove the best option. Mr. Heiser not- <br /> ed that the video security system was completely different for the City's operation <br /> allowing the Police Department to monitor City Hall, parks and the arena; includ- <br /> ing the other five cities on the system that could also be monitored from this one- <br /> enterprise-wide system. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Mr. Heiser confirmed that the IP <br /> cameras used would be the same no matter which system was used, and were <br /> available from many sources. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte advised that she would vote in support of this request in <br /> order to move it forward, reminding that she was the person pushing for Wi-Fi <br /> availability, but suggested those facilities used more or larger and used more ex- <br /> clusively for PowerPoint presentations or needing such amenities, should be first <br /> on the priority list, with smaller facilities to follow as applicable. Councilmember <br /> Laliberte clarified that, while she preferred the remaining installation issue return <br /> for City Council sooner versus later, she didn't think installations needed comple- <br /> tion immediately at all facilities at once, with the exception of door access and se- <br /> curity cameras in all buildings. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that part of the City Council's previous direction to staff had <br /> been the cost and prioritization components as part of their overall analysis. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: McGehee; Willmus: Laliberte; Etten; Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.