My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0714
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0714
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2014 11:01:08 AM
Creation date
7/22/2014 10:55:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/14/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 14,2014 <br /> Page 12 <br /> Recess <br /> Mayor Roe recessed the meeting at approximately 6:55 p.m. and reconvened at approximately <br /> 6:58 p.m. Since the meeting was running ahead of schedule, Mayor Roe advised that some <br /> agenda items would be adjusted to allow presenters to arrive. <br /> 14. Business Items—Presentations/Discussions <br /> a. Discuss Amusement Devices as a Conditional Use <br /> In summarizing the RCA dated July 14, 2014, Community Development Director <br /> Paul Bilotta noted staff's previous recommendation to the City Council to amend <br /> this portion of Code allowing amusement devices to be considered under a Condi- <br /> tional use approval process. However, Mr. Bilotta noted that the City Council had <br /> not felt comfortable with that recommendation pending further information, and <br /> addressing additional questions, and meet with the City Attorney to address those <br /> issues. Mr. Bilotta noted that the current definition of amusement devices was <br /> very different than simple video arcades from the past, especially with advanced <br /> technology available, with some of those identified in the RCA, and sought direc- <br /> tion from the City Council. <br /> Based on their planning expertise, Mayor Roe asked why staff believed the origi- <br /> nal ordinance provided for exemption of certain types of establishments, and <br /> whether that was based on more stringent requirements for those facilities under <br /> State Statute (e.g. liquor license controls), with Mr. Bilotta responding affirma- <br /> tively. <br /> Mayor Roe question whether, in pages 2 and 3 of the RCA, those items listed(e.g. <br /> lighting plans, traffic management, parking, etc.) were already covered more <br /> broadly for commercial uses in the City's Zoning Code. <br /> Mr. Bilotta noted that there were higher restrictions for these amusement devices, <br /> areas and game rooms - as defined — under the Conditional Use application; and <br /> attempted to address future issues (e.g. roving circuses) that may find such higher <br /> restrictions prudent. <br /> Mr. Bilotta noted one area of special concern may be that of bowling alleys, and <br /> how to specifically address them, since many serve food and/or liquor and would <br /> be under those regulations as well. However, Mr. Bilotta noted that attempts <br /> could be made by a business to circumvent regulations if they didn't fall under a <br /> food and/or liquor license regulation. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated that she found the majority of this recommenda- <br /> tion appropriate; however, she questioned the higher lighting restrictions which <br /> she found to be ridiculous. Councilmember McGehee further questioned whether <br /> there may be a problem with auxiliary retail malls in residential neighborhoods or <br /> other locations that may become home to slot machines, laser tags, or other devic- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.