My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0714
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0714
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2014 11:01:08 AM
Creation date
7/22/2014 10:55:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/14/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 14, 2014 <br /> Page 13 <br /> es that could present a problem for the City and/or those adjacent neighborhoods. <br /> Councilmember McGehee concurred with Mayor Roe's questions regarding tax <br /> exempt clubs, opining that she saw no reason to exempt anything in particular. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte questioned if there were any bowling alleys that didn't <br /> serve food and/or alcohol that would not be covered elsewhere in code or statute. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested one point to remember is that this is under the licensing <br /> section of City Code, and a fee would be paid to have video games, etc. in a facili- <br /> ty, which had already come up once with a retail establishment seeking such a li- <br /> cense. Therefore, Mayor Roe stated that his struggle was with the need for regu- <br /> lation for this sub-use versus requirements for uses in the Zoning Code. Mayor <br /> Roe stated that his tendency was to let the Zoning Code cover these things and <br /> address carnivals or roving circuses through a separate means or prohibit them en- <br /> tirely. Mayor Roe opined that this seemed outdated and to be covered in other <br /> parts of City Code. <br /> Councilmember Willmus opined that the language could be cleaned up, but he al- <br /> so considered it not necessarily a bad thing for amusement devices to go through a <br /> Conditional Use process; and he would support that if it came before the City <br /> Council. Councilmember Willmus opined that some situations and sites were <br /> unique enough that the City may want to retain that check with the City Council <br /> and neighbors; and expressed his support for Conditional Use approval, but <br /> moved into the Zoning Code as Item C as suggested in the RCA, page 3, lines 94- <br /> 95. However, Councilmember Willmus stated that he agreed with Mayor Roe and <br /> Councilmember McGehee that some items spelled out in Section 303.08 (page 2 <br /> of the RCA) needed to be re-evaluated. <br /> Councilmember Etten concurred with the comments of Councilmember Willmus, <br /> supporting amusement devices as a Conditional Use under the City's Zoning <br /> Code. <br /> With one such application currently before staff, Mr. Billota suggested that one <br /> additional area for staff review would suggest whether or not to tighten up the ex- <br /> emption for restaurants. Mr. Bilotta noted that someone could attempt to bypass <br /> this provision for regulation by throwing frozen pizzas in as an offering to cir- <br /> cumvent it. <br /> Mayor Roe clarified that his intent was not to have no regulation whatsoever, par- <br /> ticularly those things that may have yet to be considered, but to simply clean up <br /> language to retain things needing licensed under licensing regulations, such as in- <br /> surance requirements, etc.,but to move other applicable items under consideration <br /> through a Conditional Use process. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.