My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0714
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0714
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2014 11:01:08 AM
Creation date
7/22/2014 10:55:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/14/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 14, 2014 <br /> Page 26 <br /> la, there were no adjustments needed, based on his last revision in 2014 looking <br /> out twenty years. Mayor Roe opined that the numbers would work with alloca- <br /> tions without that $225,000; and without that $50,000 that the city had not funded <br /> in 2014 compared to the recommendation of the committee but remaining suffi- <br /> cient. <br /> Mayor Roe recognized staff's recommendation, as confirmed by Mr. Miller, for <br /> allocation of $55,000 for new capital replacements, with City Hall refunding <br /> bonds going toward capital. <br /> In addition to staff recommendations beyond refunding for 2015, Mayor Roe sug- <br /> gested looking annually at CIP projections to determine benefits from changes in <br /> planned replacement costs. However, Mayor Roe opined that it still looked fine <br /> to him, and changes could be made in the future as parks and recreation capital <br /> funding and skating center costs 2-3 years from now needed funding. Mayor Roe <br /> noted that the original CIP looked at $800,000 plus for retirement of City Hall <br /> bonds in 2020; and the original projection was to use one-quarter of that toward <br /> CIP needs. In his most recent analysis, Mayor Roe advised that perhaps that <br /> amount could be reduced, or increased to assist with those costs, or could serve to <br /> provide some form of tax levy relief. Based on his analysis, Mayor Roe advised <br /> that he was comfortable with where the CIP was at even considering the loss of <br /> Local Government Aid(LGA) funds. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that one reason the CIP was still on track was based on the CIP <br /> Task Force's recommendation to not add an inflation number each year when <br /> planning out twenty years, as that could change, but to be fair to taxpayers and <br /> provide a more realistic projection, it not be put on automatic pilot but be re- <br /> viewed annually. <br /> Councilmember Etten referenced and noted that, in the original schedule provided <br /> by the CIP Task Force, by repurposing the levy for savings financially, it helped <br /> fill in some of that gap in 2015. <br /> In response to the City Manager Recommended Budget, and since the COLA pol- <br /> icy referred to the CPI and Employment Cost Index for Municipal and State <br /> Workers, Mayor Roe asked that staff provide up-to-date numbers based on the <br /> latest information from both sources to assist in deliberations. <br /> Also, Mayor Roe asked for a better explanation and understanding from staff as <br /> regarding his personal challenge in considering FTE's how on-call firefighters <br /> were considered "0" FTE or the technical definition of FTE and how the City <br /> was actually identifying that to achieve a net FTE. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.