CC_Minutes_2014_0714 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,July 14, 2014 Page 25 across the board, and not specific to one non-union employee group; and that roughly half of the City's employees are in collective bargaining units on the tax- supported side. Councilmember Willmus questioned if the City was to forego COLA adjustments for that group of employees and defer implementing an additional number of FTE for 2015, could staff realistically be able to get down to the levy in line with infla- tion as referenced in Attachment F. Councilmember Willmus opined that, on January 1, 2013, that group received a 2% COLA, in October of 2013 another 3.6%, then in January of 2014,received another 2%. In responding to people who wondered why he kept coming back to that group, Councilmember Willmus ex- plained that his rationale was to defer any increased for FTE and COLA in 2015 to realistically get to a levy scenario in par with the rate of inflation. Finance Director Miller responded that only $69,000 would come from the levy for the new positions; with the remainder funded from other sources. If the City didn't fill any positions at all, Mr. Miller clarified that it would save an approxi- mate projected $126,000 plus the $69,000, or generate a projected levy savings of approximately$200,000, or a levy increase of 3.8%. At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Mr. Miller clarified that the savings realized from reduced debt service and Fire Relief Fund contributions were being proposed to be repurposed for the street reconstruction program and facility re- placement. Mr. Miller noted that in 2014, the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) was not fully funded, but was actually $50,000 short, and staff would rec- ommend that $160,000 be allocated to streets with the remainder toward facilities. Based on the CIP funding plan enacted by the City Council and projected in 2012, it called for additional funding in 2014, with some anticipated from State Aid, but not all, resulting in the reduction by$50,000 from that original plan. Knowing the projected CIP plan was for the long-term, Councilmember Miller questioned if this budget adequately took that into consideration in projecting CIP goals for buildings and streets. Councilmember McGehee stated that she wanted to make sure that the CIP was on track or ahead of those figures to make provi- sion for the $50,000 shortage in 2014. Mr. Miller advised that he was not sure of the operational or service levels for the CIP, but based on what was available now and what needed to be raised to meet replacement scheduled, the 2015 budget as proposed would get closer back on track that the CIP was several years ago. As part of the CIP Task Force recommendations made several years ago, Mayor Roe noted that there was an annual set aside to fund the CIP, and a related annual review of projected costs. Based on his analysis, Mayor Roe opined that it ap- peared that even with the loss of$225,000 in state aid due to their revised formu-