Laserfiche WebLink
<br />JAN 1S 'S6 10:37 FROM ROSEVILLE PROPERTIES <br /> <br />PAGE.001 <br /> <br /> <br />'ROSEVllLE <br />MANAGEMENT COMPANY <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />. January ,19, 1996 <br /> <br />VIA FAX 490-2'31 <br /> <br />Michael FaJk, City Plaouer <br />CITY OF R.OSEVILLE <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Ro5CVille, MN 5S 113 <br /> <br />Re: Proposed Ordinance Amendment - Public Heming <br /> <br />.Dear MJke: <br /> <br />On behalfofour company, I n=ed to respond to the proposed onIinBnoe ~ ooI8e <br />from snow removal. deliveries. etc. <br />, <br /> <br />I" <br /> <br />WhiJe Pm not sure how IIIIDY of our properties might be atJected, J do know that it would <br />be ~88t"b1e not to plow, ror example, during the night. Many times, pk>wiDg begioa <br />when _hVISes close B>r the" ~ and doesn't conclude untilS or 6 a.m.~ just befOre <br />employees and deJiveries return. <br /> <br />Many deliveries come ftom out of state and it would. seem impoSSlOle to scbedu1e certain <br />deli~ in a rc:stricttd time fuune. ~Jia-S trash rerooval, again it beoomes difticu1t <br />and risky, many times, to have trash removed during the day amongst the dehry and <br />business traffic. <br /> <br />I would hate to see a restrictive ordiDBDce eoacted, that may only impeot a SIIIIll portion of <br />the city's popuJarton, cause more dtmculty fbr businesses to maintain their operation in <br />RoseviIle or not even to CODAider it as a location. <br /> <br />n to very carefully consider any more restrictive ordinances such as tbe one <br />and the impact to business dcvcJopnx::ut wiIbio ~ city. <br /> <br /> <br />Mark E. De, C!M <br />Vice President <br />:;si <br /> <br />2S'15 N. Fairview . Suite 2SO · Rosevi11e, UN SSW · (612) ~12 · Pax iU-9221 <br /> <br />** TOTAL PAGE. as I ** <br /> <br />