My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02808
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2800
>
pf_02808
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:11:08 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:18:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2808
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
SNOW REMOVAL ORDINANCE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />Plannine: Commission Comments: <br />1. At the regular meeting of November 8, 1995, the Planning Commission <br />moved to recommend that no formal recommendation be provided to the <br />COWlcil regarding the establishment of standards concerning deliveries, snow <br />removal, and trash collection in commercial/industrial areas adjacent to <br />residential areas, but that the following comments be submitted: <br /> <br />a. Rubbish pickups and deliveries can be scheduled but snow and snow <br />removal cannot be scheduled and should not be regulated. <br />b. Before adopting a new ordinance, there should be work done with <br />adjoining neighbors and the property owners of the centers. <br />c. Churches and schools also need early plowing. This may add to the <br />confusion of the regulations. <br />d. By limiting the hours of snow removal, trash pickup and delivery, the <br />City places a hardship on public and private owners to either hire <br />. additional staff or pay for the late hour plowing. Deliveries can be <br />regulated without such a hardship. <br /> <br />2. There was a feeling that the necessary codes currently exist but need to be <br />enforced. The general prohibition of the nuisance code are broad and should <br />encompass any enforcement problems. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br />1. Based on a review of the current ordinances and the Planning Commission <br />discussions regarding the regulations of snow plowing, rubbish pickup and <br />deliveries in commercial and industrial areas adjacent to residential zones, the <br />following conclusions can be drawn: <br /> <br />a. The general prohibitions against noise in the nuisance section of the <br />City Code are broad and should encompass any enforcement problems <br />but specific enforcement has proven to be difficult, especially after <br />nonnal working hours ~and on weekends regarding sweeping, plowing <br />and garbage pick-up. <br />b. In the current code, specific hours for deliveries and refuse handling <br />are limited to regulating the residential zoning districts~ yet, it is the <br />adjoining industrial and commercial properties that cause problems for <br />the residential areas. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.