Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Lake Owasso No-Wake Comments at 12/05/95 Bearin2 <br />Notes by Dennis Welsch <br /> <br />90% of owners petitioned (112) supported. <br /> <br />Peg Egli. 705 Heinel Circle, Lake Association member. <br /> <br />ISO' no wake would cause problems <br />Grass Lake Water Management Review <br />Goal is to maintain and enhance <br />Concerned regarding slalom at the "narrows" <br />Ski-club considering a I-mile long run <br />Doug Behm would approve unless safety issue <br />Sheriff's office has sole jurisdiction <br /> <br />The 300 foot ordinance is only thing preventing slalom. <br /> <br />Noise, lake traffic, loss of wildlife habitat, water quality <br />Safety for sailing and canoes <br />Slalom is visually intrusive <br /> <br />Recommends: Keeping ordinance as presently written <br /> <br />Ski boat wake/wash creates turbidity in shallows <br />With lake turbidity, run-off control problems increase/cannot be measured <br />Increased turbidity, decreased light, less rooted plants, more algae <br />Algae growth create low O2 and fish kills in winter <br />PCA trophic condition of lakes~ property values, algae weeds, desirability better with <br />lower turbidity, phosphates <br />Multi-use fishing, pontooning, canoe, sail are inhibited by ski slalom which have 2-3 <br />already on lake. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Lake is only 635' wide at narrow point when weeds are considered. <br /> <br />Donn W. _ There once was a speed limit on lower end of lake - how did it work? <br /> <br />Steve Gallop.. 435 Walnut Lane, Shoreview Ad Hoc Lake Regulation Committee <br /> <br />Shoreview adopted 150' because it had no wake regUlations <br />DNR would not allow 300' setback 1', 100', and ISO' <br />Sheriff will only enforce 150' <br />Without Roseville's agreement, there is no enforceable regulations. <br />People boat on calm end oflake (south) <br />Lake Owasso Home Association enforces 150'~ should not worry about slalom courses <br />