Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Both City's had to give permission for slalom courses <br />150' conforms to state guidelines, sheriff enforces 150' <br />Sheriff believes 300' is too restrictive, pushes everyone to center of lake <br />New ordinance allows straight-out wake with skiing <br />Should not restrict one group of users <br />Petitions (over 40) for 150' <br />Slower speed on south end oflake may not be possible <br /> <br />Bob Bell. City Attorney <br /> <br />. Roseville ordinance (water) predates state regulations, therefore is lawful. <br /> <br />pric Egli <br /> <br />Roseville ordinance prior to 1973 are valid <br />Doug Behn made no mention of City approval needed <br />If allowed as joint powers agreement, lose local authority <br /> <br />Jim Vanous. 2924 W. Owasso <br /> <br />Environmental issues - 2nd slalom is not needed <br />Noise, visual eyesore, safety are concerns <br />South end oflake is fishing area <br />Eliminate high speed traffic on south end of lake <br /> <br />Rob Linder. 631 Heinel Drive (water skier, wind surfer) <br /> <br />Protect lake as it stands <br />Do not allow increase in lake activity <br />Sheriff does police it properly <br />Be conservative, stick with what has been in place <br />Fisherman need 300' of protected water <br /> <br />Keith Peterson. 1360 Terrace Drive <br /> <br />Should be 150' no wake <br />300' setback does not restrict use oflake, pushes boats to center <br />If sheriff were to enforce, it would push boats into center of lake (unsafe) <br />Need more courtesy than new laws <br />Decreasing the permitted uses on the lake, decreases the home/property value <br /> <br />John Ledy. 3130 W. Owasso Boulevard <br /> <br />Lake Owasso has variety of boating <br />Never been aware of 300' no wake because: <br />