Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Proposal for Joint Powers Agreement Concerning Lake Owasso <br />Eric A. Egli, Roseville Community Meeting March 7, 1996 <br /> <br />1) No wake zones shall be 1 SO' in all areas of the lake. <br /> <br />2) A 15 mph speed limit shall be in place for the south end of the lake extending from the <br />southwest boundary of the lake to the narrows area as indicated on the map. <br /> <br />3) An exception will be made for homeowners living in the affected area of the lake who <br />will be permitted to tow skiers to and from their docks to the open area of the lake. <br /> <br />Rationale: <br /> <br />The affected area of the lake has a depth ranging from 2 to 5 feet. less in low water times. <br />This water covers a 2 to 3 foot thick mucky bottom which is easily disturbed by even gentle <br />water motion, leaving the water murky for a long period thereafter. The Grass Lake Water <br />Management District has identified prop wash as a contributor to poor water quality. High <br />speed props are operating only inches from the muck, leaving a dense trail of mucky water. <br />Water quality and clarity is a high priority for water management (many thousands are <br />being spent to improve quality by altering flow patterns from central park to Owasso). Poor <br />water quality adversely affects fishing by favoring rough fish over game fish habitat. <br />Fishing along the weeds is the primary use of this end of the lake. <br /> <br />This end of the lake is narrow and only allows the safe passage of two boats abreast. High <br />speed boats turning in this area present a hazard, especially when the nearby anchored <br />fishing boats are considered. Canoeing and other slow boat recreation is quite hazardous in <br />the open water of this area. Another popular use of this end is pontoon boating. which <br />further increases overall traffic and safety concerns. <br /> <br />Currently there are no areas on the lake where quieter boating pursuits are favored, and <br />problems with high wakes and low profile can make canoeing, paddleboating and other <br />slow uses hazardous when high speed boats are maneuvering in the narrow area. <br /> <br />Maintaining both 150' and 300' no wake zones on a single lake seems impractical. <br /> <br />.. <br />.. <br /> <br />Removing this area from high speed boating only reduces the lake area available for skiing <br />by J3%, while protecting property owners rights to ski to and from their dock. It will <br />protect water quality and promote improved game fishing. It will provide a small area <br />where fishing, slow speed motoring and non-motorized uses of the lake will be enhanced <br />and made reasonably safe. <br />