Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />chance of ever being accomplished. In this regard, our analysis <br />suggest that from the highly limited data which has been made Ii JAV <br />available, there are major questions as to feasibility. -)~(JW PL;1VI <br /> <br />Utility Improvements: From consultation with the City <br />Engineering Department Staff, it was learned that there are <br />utilities in place in the existing industrial area. However, <br />these utilities will have to be enlarged and improved to handle <br />the increased use placed upon the system by residential units and <br />other more intensive uses such as office and retail. There has <br />however been no apparent study done that addresses the expected <br />extent or cost of these needed improvements. The City's <br />Engineering Department has indicated that many laterals and large <br />overall service expansions will be required in this redevelopment <br />area to accommodate the plan which has been recommended. <br /> <br />Land Use compatibility and Harmony: The urban design style plan <br />which constitutes the proposed Twin Lakes Redevelopment Plan <br />reflects a harmonious land use arrangement. A major concern <br />however is the transitional period of redevelopment from today's <br />uses and activities to tho~e eventually to be accomplished. At <br />issue is the proposed phasing plan plus the unspecified <br />redevelopment period. <br /> <br />It is understood that the phasing plan is founded to a major <br />degree on the expressed willingness of existing uses to relocate <br />and vacate the area. Many of these operations are apparently on <br />the periphery of the study area and therefore redevelopment will <br />largely take place from the outer edges inward. To be noted <br />however is that the willingness to relocate is not universally <br />accepted. This situation could result in a lack of <br />compatibility even at the periphery of the area. Conflict is <br />however also envisioned in the general inward phasing which is <br />proposed. In many cases the existing industrial uses internally <br />located will encounter, as well as create problems for the new <br />activities to be introduced. Major truck traffic is seen as a. <br />problem for new retail, office as well as residential <br />development. Noise is typically a similar industrial <br />characteristic which will cause compatibility problems. <br />Conversely, major traffic created by office and commercial <br />development will likely hamper industrial use. The phasing plan <br />as now suggested is therefore seen as creating, for an interim <br />period, major land use incompatibilities. compounding this <br />situation is the uncertainty as to the time during which such <br />problems will exist. <br /> <br /> <br />sis: The City <br />cost of road <br />and potential <br />their analysis. <br /> <br />conducted its own <br />improvements, net <br />land uses. The <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />R-0002684 <br /> <br /><. <br />