Laserfiche WebLink
<br />It is the Community Development staffs opinion that it is appropriate to consider such <br />parking setback reductions because the city's current standards may be outdated. may <br />create over priced/underutilized industrial land, and do not reflect the type of <br />development the City is attempting to promote in its industrial areas. The City is <br />promoting a business park type development rather than heavier industrial type <br />development in a number of its industrial areas. It may be appropriate to have parking <br />setbacks which are consistent with business zoning districts. The City has also adopted <br />design standards since the industrial parking setback standards were adopted. This helps <br />to reduce the impact of the reduced setback. <br /> <br />SUKeested 'Council Action: <br /> <br />1) <br /> <br />Motion'to determine that a PUD is not necessary in this case because the revisions which <br />Ryan Companies has made to their plans eliminates the need for variances.The Council <br />hereby accepts Ryan's withdrawal of a PUD and/or variance request. <br /> <br />Motion to direct staff;o study r ~ ~king setback standards in industrial zoning <br />dIstncts and prepare an draft or~~~ment for Plannmg CommIssIon and Cny <br />, Council consideration in August. Any reduction in parking setback should be conditioned ~/_ <br />. on the pro\.ision of additional benning, screening, and landscaping. fu ~ 11'lJ<?' <br /> <br />_ Motion to direct staff to prepare a Master PUD Plan for all of Twin Lakes after the BR W <br />. transportation a::d ponding studies arecompl~e. Vg- ~ I "117 <br /> <br />.~ ()J1uJa MJi1J uH '1&J wr.tu au, ...- ____ - = <br />~ <br />G) <br /> <br />- <br />'2) <br /> <br />3) <br /> <br />Staff Report by: Rick Jopke <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />) <br />