Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" Nb"T A NEAJ j7IAf.JL-IG 1--+~APH'..\b <br /> <br />_ CC'U\NGll 111-\'/ At?{tf:::D Fo(2- INP<-<.T ~f\(:Ey otJ HEAF-II',y~ <br />f (2-f---J I 0 L.I c;; r... '--I .H:t'::L D. _'"_ <br />(~ (\JO f\..)fC(...) k\011 q~. ~7 ~~,...) p~o.J /C/@? <br />CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT <br /> <br />Planner Approval <br /> <br />DATE: 7-10.-96 <br />CASE NO: 2824 <br /> <br />Department Approval: Agenda Section: <br />7(a) <br /> <br />City Council request for recommendatiolfs concerning PUD or other <br />alternative approaches concerning Ryan Companies proposed <br />redevelopment at 2778 N. Cleveland Avenue. <br /> <br />Item Description: <br /> <br />Bacqround: . <br /> <br />1) Ryan Companies owns a 6;6J~cr~si!~x~t~71~z~:Gl~Y~!1W4~venue. ..The site is currently <br />occupied by Midwest Motor Express which operates a motor freight terminal on the site. <br />The site is bounded by Cleveland Avenue on the west, the unimproved lona Street (Twin <br />Lakes Parkway) right-of-way on the south, the unimproved Mount Ridge Road right-of- <br />way on the east and the American Semi Trailer Truck related use on the north. Ryan <br />Companies is proposing to 4e11;191isb.';;Mt~}{isting,s@ctiII'es'onthe site and construct a new <br />.lOQ,OOOt()105,OOOsq.fpofflc~I:\V;~~1i9'4~~;jJ?}!HgA~g on the site. Ryan Companies <br />originally,applied for...~pl@,t1~4t1Pit<!~Y~!QPm~~tzfor the site. Notice for the proposed <br />PUD was mailed and sent in May, 1996. The approval of this PUD and the standards and <br />conditions attached to it could set the minimum standards for future development in the <br />area. <br /> <br />. 2) The'CommunityDevelop~e.~t'])e~8J.f.I~ientstai.frecommendedthatit.is more appropriate <br />to consider this proposalasa~e~eefller~arkingiN~f.IDC~ request only. <br />~.I'=-- <br />3) The Planning Commission;'oIlMay,8;1996,.recpmmeridedCity Council approval of a 40. <br />footparking setba.ckyariarice: <br /> <br />4) The City Council at its May 28, 1996 meeting, closed the public hearing and continued <br />consideration of this item until June 25, 1996. <br /> <br />5) The City 9~uncil,~titsJun~;:2?,)!22~;m~~t!9~'9~9iiB9t;~F~~Pttb.esetback variance and <br />requested,thatthe PlapningComnussi(jnrevie.wtm$YJn~ttera.tthe July 1 0., 1996.meeting <br />and provide the City Council with a recommendation concerning approval of a PUD or <br />other alternative approaches on the site. <br /> <br />1 <br />