My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02856
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2800
>
pf_02856
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:16:47 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:22:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2856
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
ACI FENCE
PIN
122923310086
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />WORK SESSION AGENDA ITEM NO. 7 <br /> <br />City of Roseville <br />Community Development Department <br /> <br />Memo <br />Jan 11, 1996 <br /> <br />TO: Steve Sarkozy, City Manager <br />FROM: Dennis Welsch, Community Development Director (490-2232) ~ <br /> <br />RE: A.C.I. FENCE EXTENSION COST ESTIMATES <br /> <br />Attached are the cost estimates that we requested from Keller Home Improvement to extend their <br />previous fence project at the back of the AC.I. site. <br /> <br />The fence extension (similar design as previous fence) is estimated to be 210 feet long and would <br />cost $6,945.00. This amounts to $33.07 per lineal foot offence. To remove the existing fence (72 <br />feet), add an additional $370.00. Within the next week, AC.I. will review these costs and <br />hopefully agree to the improvement on their leased property or the land owner (St. Paul <br />Properties) will have to hecome an additional partner. I am assuming that this fence extension <br />would paid for on a 50%/50% basis between AC.I. and the City. <br /> <br />FURTHER FENCE EXTENSION BEYOND A.C.I.: <br /> <br />There is approximately 500 feet of additional residential area behind ARA, another user to the <br />west of AC.I. If these ~idents also needed a fence, the added cost for this section would be <br />approximately $16,500\jhis assumes that the City could obtain permission to install the fence on <br />private property and some type of agreement from the property owner to maintain it in the future. <br /> <br />POLICY DECISIONS: <br /> <br />This form of "buffering" of existing businesses from residential areas is a proactive approach to <br />the noise and visual problems that Roseville has along some of the industrial/commercial and <br />residential borders. As in the past, it is my assumption that the Council will want to review this <br />policy city-wide as well as on a case by case basis. This could become a very expensive program <br />on the remaining existing commercial and industrial parcels along Rice, Larpentuer, Lexington, <br />and Snelling. Another example is the County Road "C" area between Hamline and Snelling, <br />where the cost of minimal fencing in this area would cost in excess of $48,000. <br /> <br />"\"\,.... I, .. _ ~. It> v.e.J:I. ~~ Ie....u... j ~ oodi,,~ Ie ~ <br />Vv"",\N~. - U -- - - . ~ \.()Cc) ~ Lo~ <br />~l.A>etli- ~ ~ ~ cJi& ~ ~ ~.LCI.~ t1.t^'~ <br /> <br />~~ "J!.~.,.~~~CYlfOar"M4V''t ~ ~~() r~ct? <br /> <br />DIM (>>,0..- ~ ~~~ ~~~ \t ~ ~~ <br />~. 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.