Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Potential Environmental Contamination <br /> <br />The Twin Lakes Business Park has a history of environmental site assessment (ESA) work associated <br />with its transfonnation from a trucking industrial center to light industrial/warehousing and commercial <br />properties with little potential for site contamination. Since 1991, there have been 8 Environmental Site <br />Assessments (phase I and Phase ll) conducted for 5 properties that have been redeveloped or have been <br />cleared of previous uses. There have also been remediation work plans developed for four redeveloped <br />sites (Twin Lakes Corporate Center, Arthur Street Extension, Ryan Twin Lakes IV property, and the <br />fonner Great Dane Site). Most of the fmdings, in general, related to fuel spills and leaking underground <br />storage tanks, hazardous waste or chemical generation on the property, potential PCB containing <br />materials, abandoned wells, inactive septic systems, and building materials containing asbestos. <br />Remediation activities for these properties have been completed. An annotated bibliography of the <br />related hazardous waste and contaminated property site assessment and remediation plans is presented <br />in Attachment D. <br /> <br />There are known locations of leaking fuel storage tanks within the study area and in the 30 properties <br />to be redeveloped. The majority of these properties are located in the western one-third of the study <br />area. ESA activities and remediation work programs similar to what has been conducted to date, as <br />noted above, will continue as redevelopment proposals are received for the remainder of the properties <br />in the Twin Lakes Development Area. <br /> <br />10. Cover Types. Estimate the acreage of the site with each ofthe following cover types before and after <br />development (before and after totals should be equal): <br /> <br />Cover TVDe <br />Urban/Suburban LawnlLandscaped <br />Impervious Surfaces <br />Wetland (Drainage Ditch) <br />Disturbed Open Space <br /> <br />Before (ac) <br />6 <br />109 <br />I <br />10 <br /> <br />After (ac) <br />23 <br />98 <br />1 <br />4 <br /> <br />Total <br /> <br />126 <br /> <br />126 <br /> <br />11. Fish, Wildlife, and Ecologically Sensitive Resources <br /> <br />a. Describe fish and wildlife resources on or near the site and discuss how they would be affected <br />by the project. Describe any measures to be taken to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. <br /> <br />Response: The diversity and population of wildlife species in an area is directly related to the <br />type and quality of habitat that exists in that area. The study area is in a part of Roseville that <br />has been fully developed for 30:1: years. A large percentage of the study area is comprised of <br />buildings, parking areas, and other impervious surfaces and provides little or no wildlife habitat <br />opportunity. The only areas of wildlife habitat found in the study area are classified as either <br />urban/suburban, lawn/landscaped areas or disturbed open space. A small amount of woodlot <br />is found as fringe to the adjacent tracts of woodland habitat. This area of woodlot was included <br />in the disturbed open space classification. <br /> <br />#24397 <br /> <br />7 <br />