Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The urban/suburban, lawnllandscaped areas within the project corridor provide habitat for urban <br />wildlife species that have generally adapted to these conditions. Passerine birds, crows, gray <br />squirrels, rabbits, and raccoons can typically be found in such cover. There will be a small net <br />gain of this habitat type as a result of this project. This small increase in habitat will have little <br />to no effect on wildlife in the project area. <br /> <br />Most of the disturbed open space within the study area has been graded at least once and is used <br />for temporary storage of trailers, pallets, etc. It is vegetated primarily by brome grass, <br />goldenrods, various shrubby plants and cottonwood trees at varying stages of development. <br />This disturbed open space supports the same type of wildlife as the urban/suburban <br />lawn/landscaped areas described above. Some of this disturbed open space will be converted <br />to development. Any wildlife displaced as a result of this redevelopment would move into the <br />contiguous open space or adapt to the increased lawn/landscaped areas. <br /> <br />The wetland habitat in the study area is linear in nature and limited to the fringes of a steep sided <br />drainage ditch in the southeast part of the study area (see Figure 4). Due to the linear nature, <br />adjacent steep sides and conveyance of stormwater, this wetland area provides little habitat <br />value. This project is not expected to have any impact on wetland within the study area and <br />therefore no impact on wildlife associated with this type of wetland. <br /> <br />A review by the DNR Wildlife Specialist for the Metro area found that the study area has no <br />valuable habitat or significant wildlife populations and that the proposed project is not likely to <br />have an adverse affect on wildlife (Stradtmann, personal communication). <br /> <br />b. Are there any state-listed endangered, threatened, or special-concern species; rare plant <br />communities; colonial waterbird nesting colonies; native prairie or other rare habitat; or other <br />sensitive ecological resources on or near the site? <br /> <br />Yes --X- No <br /> <br />If yes, describe the resource and how it would be affected by the project. Indicate if a site <br />survey of the resources was conducted. Describe measures to be taken to minimize or avoid <br />adverse impacts. <br /> <br />Response: A search of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources's Natural Heritage <br />Program (MNHP) database was conducted for the Twin Lakes Development Area, including <br />a one mile radius surrounding the study area. According to the MNHP letter of response dated <br />April I, 1997, "there are no known occurrences of rare species or natural features in the area <br />searched" (Attachment E). In support, an EA W developed for the Centre Pointe Business Park <br />contains a letter from Minnesota's Natural Heritage Program (MNHP) of the DNR, dated <br />January 6, 1997. According to MNHP, there are no records or observations of any significant <br />natural heritage features or Threatened or Endangered Species within one mile of that project, <br />which is adjacent to the northwest portion of the Twin Lakes Study Area (Attachment F). <br /> <br />#24397 <br /> <br />8 <br />