Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Appendix B, continued <br /> <br />identifies the land uses in the Twin Lakes Project Area which currently exist and are assumed not to be <br />redeveloped by 2010. In order to estimate background conditions, only these land uses and their resultant <br />trips were used to forecast 2011 traffic. The location of the sites identified can found on Figure 3 in the main <br />body of the EA W. <br /> <br />After revising the future land uses based on Tables Bl and B2, 2011 trips were generated and then distributed <br />and assigned to the year Design Year 2011 model network. The proposed Twin Lakes Parkway was added <br />to the network as a two lane boulevard from the existing I-3SW ramps at Cleveland Avenue North of County <br />Road C to Snelling A venue, taking over what is now Terrace Drive. The proposed parkway intersects Mount <br />Ridge Road, Arthur Avenue, Fairview Avenue and Snelling Avenue. The Snelling Avenue connection is <br />planned as a right turn in/right turn out intersection. The Northbound exit loop from I-3SW to County Road <br />C was removed from the network as well as Prior Avenue and Mount Ridge Road between proposed Twin <br />Lakes Parkway and County Road C. Figure BS identifies the expected roadway changes in and around the <br />Twin Lakes Project Area. <br /> <br />The background traffic assigned to the 2011 road network comprises the forecast of background Average <br />Daily Traffic (ADT). Background PM peak hour turning movement forecasts were developed by first <br />applying a PM peak hour percentage of 10% to the ADT. This percentage was based on the relationship of <br />existing PM peak hour turning movements and existing ADT found on Figures B2 and B3, respectively. The <br />10% ADT's were split out into PM peak hour turning movements using existing PM peak hour turning <br />movements as a base. The 2011 background turning movements are shown on Figure B6. <br /> <br />DeveloDment of Site Generated Traffic Forecasts <br /> <br />Site generated traffic was established using the ITE Trio Generation Manual, Sth Edition (1991). First, the <br />type and intensity of the land uses currently existing on parcels within the project area identified for <br />(re )development was detennined. An estimation of daily and PM peak hour trips generated from the existing <br />land uses on parcels identified for (re)development was made using trip generation rates from the ITE Trip <br />Generation Manual, Sth Edition (1991). The generation totals can be found in Table B3. The totals were <br />reduced by 10% to account for internal trips on the site. The ITE Trio Generation Manual, Sth Edition (1991) <br />states that on site internal trips generally range from IS% to 4S%. The table shows that approximately 7,SOO <br />daily trips and over 1,000 PM peak hour trips would be removed from the Twin Lakes Project Area due to <br />(re )development. <br /> <br />An estimation of trips to be added to the Twin Lakes Project Area because the proposed development and <br />redevelopment was completed by applying trip generation rates from the HE Trio Generation Manual, Sth <br />Edition (1991) to the proposed building footprints of the (re)development sites. (See Attachment "C" of <br />EA W.) The resulting site generated traffic forecast of daily and PM peak hour trips can be found in Table <br />B4. The table shows that approximately IS,SOO daily trips and 2,000 PM peak hour trips would be added to <br />the Twin Lakes Project Area as a result of (re )development. The trip generation was reduced by 10% to <br />account for internal trips on site. <br /> <br />At this time, the City of Roseville projects that (re)development within the Twin Lakes Project Area will be <br />office/showroom with a SO/SO split between office and showroom/warehouse land uses. Currently, no site <br />plans exist for the parcels slated for redevelopment within the Twin Lakes Project Area. In order to generate <br />trips and distribute and assign them to the surrounding roadway network, Parcels 1 to 30 (see Figure 3 in main <br />body of EA W) were logically grouped into subareas based on size and whether or not they were adjacent to <br />one another. The groupings are defined in Table B4. Parcels were grouped into subareas so that the <br />combined square footage of the building footprint would fall within the range of 40,000 to 200,000 square <br /> <br />*24397 <br /> <br />58 <br />