My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02867
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2800
>
pf_02867
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:17:50 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:22:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2867
Planning Files - Type
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN/TWIN LAK
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
320
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />locations which make it nearly impossible to construct Twin lakes Parkway at the <br />location called for in the original plan. In the spring of 1996, the consultant firm of BRW <br />was hired by the City to review the 1988 plan and make recommendations concerning <br />the appropriate roadway alignment, excess right-of-way that should be vacated, and the <br />design of Twin lakes Parkway and resolve associated utility issues. <br /> <br />The City Council has received a copy of the report recently completed by BRW. The <br />report recommends that the location of Twin lakes Parkway, west of Fairview Avenue <br />be changed to line up with the existing 35W ramps. This recommendations follows <br />numerous discussions with the Minnesota Department of Transportation, the Minnesota <br />Department of Natural Resources, the Rice Creek Watershed District, and others <br />concerning the ability of the City to relocate the existing interchange further north <br />through the existing DNR protected wetland. Based on those discussions, BRWand <br />City staff determined that the ability to move that interchange to line up with the <br />proposed location of Twin lakes Parkway would be nearly impossible because of new <br />State wetland protection laws. The proposal would also result in a design which does <br />not meet Federal transportation standards. The City would also have to bear a majority <br />of the cost for the interchange relocation. <br /> <br />The new alignment would require the City to purchase all of the Cummins Diesel and <br />Metro PaperlWeyerhaeuser site, and portion of the Extra leasing, Indianhead, Hyman <br />Freightway, and Twin lakes Corporate Center land. <br /> <br />The strategy here is to use City TIF, State Aid road funds and road improvement <br />assessments to acquire and improve the Industrial Business Park roads and property <br />access rather than donating funds to MnDOT to correct their road ramps. <br /> <br />The Study will request MnDOT to improve the existing ramp by correcting the "decision <br />point - County Road C east or west" and expanding the capacity of the ramp at MnDOT <br />expense. <br /> <br />BRW also studied and made recommendations concerning construction of utilities <br />including sanitary sewer and water, as well as regional storm water holding facilities, <br />The report proposes that a major new regional storm water facility be constructed on <br />the north side of the DNR protected wetland on MnDOT property, including a small <br />portion of the south part of the Centre Pointe project site. <br /> <br />Finally, BRW reviewed the actual design of the road right-of-way and has <br />recommended that the right-of-way be limited to 90 feet in width and that other parallel <br />streets be vacated to make more land available for development. <br /> <br />Meeting with Businesses: <br /> <br />The City staff held a meeting with business and property owners on October 3, 1996. <br />Issues which were identified included: <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.