My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014_0811_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2014
>
2014_0811_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2014 4:02:20 PM
Creation date
8/7/2014 4:18:11 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
207
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table 1005-1 <br />."#"2"Ͷ2"ͷ#-53³ £ ±£² <br />building) <br />Dwelling,multifamily(upperstoriesin <br />PPNP t NP t P <br />mixedusebuilding) <br />Dwelling,multifamily(8ormoreunits <br />CNP t NP t NP t P <br />perbuilding) <br />Dwellingunit,accessory <br />NPNPNPNPC bt <br />Y <br />LiveworkunitCNPNPNPPY <br />2¤²¨£¤³¨ «ȟ'±®´¯,¨µ¨¦ <br />Communityresidentialfacility,state <br />CNPNPNPCY <br />licensed,serving716persons <br />StudenthousingNPPPPNP <br />Y <br />Nursinghome,assistedlivingfacilityCCCCCY <br />#¨µ¨¢ £)²³¨³´³¨® «5²¤² <br />Collegeorpostsecondaryschool, <br />NPNPPPP bt Y <br />campus <br />Collegeorpostsecondaryschool,office <br />PPPPPY <br />based <br />Communitycenter,library,municipal <br />NPNPPPP <br />building <br />PlaceofassemblyPPPPPY <br />School,elementaryorsecondaryNPNPPPP bt Y <br />Theater,performingartscenterNPNPPPPY <br />(Ord.1427,792012;Ord.1445,782013;Ord.1446,782013;Ord.1447,782013;Ord.1451,8122013) <br />SR <br />TAFF ECOMMENDATION <br />38 <br />Based on the comments provided above in this report, the Planning Division recommends <br />39 <br />TA <br />approval of the proposed to Table 1005-1 of the Zoning Ordinance. <br />EXT MENDMENTS <br />40 <br />PCA <br />LANNINGOMMISSIONCTION <br />41 <br />At their meeting of May 5, 2014, the Planning Commission held the duly noticed public hearing <br />42 <br />regarding the text amendment request. No citizens addressed the Commission, but <br />43 <br />Commissioners did want to better understanding on why “college or post-secondary school, <br />44 <br />campus” in the CMU district was being changed from permitted to not permitted. The City and <br />45 <br />Senior Planner’s provided responses to commissioners regarding these items (see Attachment <br />46 <br />A). <br />47 <br />The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the proposed text amendments, <br />48 <br />with the Planning staff to review and possibly modify the definition of student housing. <br />49 <br />50 <br />RCA_TextAmdts_071414 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.