Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> Date: August 11, 2014 <br /> Item No.: 7.e <br />Department Approval City Manager Approval <br />Item Description: Adopt a Sign Retroreflectivity Policy <br />B <br />ACKGROUND <br />1 <br />All agencies, including cities, who maintain roadways open to public travel, must adopt a sign <br />2 <br />maintenance program designed to maintain traffic sign retroreflectivity at or above specific <br />3 <br />levels. <br />4 <br />“Retroreflectivity” describes how light is reflected from a surface and returned to its original <br />5 <br />source. <br />6 <br />Traffic signs are made with retroreflective sign sheeting material that redirects headlamp <br />7 <br />illumination back toward the vehicle, thereby making the sign visible at nighttime to the vehicle <br />8 <br />driver. Improvements to nighttime visibility of traffic signs will help drivers better navigate <br />9 <br />roads at night and thus promote safety and mobility. Improvements in sign visibility will also <br />10 <br />help older drivers whose visual capabilities may be declining. <br />11 <br />The retroreflective properties of all sign sheeting materials degrade over time making signs <br />12 <br />progressively less visible at night. As signs degrade and become less retroreflective, their <br />13 <br />effectiveness in communicating regulatory, warning, and guidance messages to road users at <br />14 <br />nighttime diminishes to the point that they cannot be seen or read in time for the driver to react <br />15 <br />properly. Thus, to maintain nighttime effectiveness, signs should be replaced before they reach <br />16 <br />the end of their useful life. <br />17 <br />Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices <br />The(MUTCD), published by the U.S. Department <br />18 <br />of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), sets forth basic principles of <br />19 <br />traffic signs in order to promote safety on public roads. The MUTCD establishes uniform <br />20 <br />standards for traffic signs. <br />21 <br />The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MN/DOT) has adopted the MUTCD and certain <br />22 <br />Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices <br />MN/DOT appendices as the (MN <br />23 <br />MUTCD). See http://www.dot.state.mn.us/trafficeng/publ/mutcd/. <br />24 <br />The Minnesota Commissioner of Transportation has ordered that the MN MUTCD shall be <br />25 <br />implemented and applied to all traffic control devices. <br />26 <br />The MN MUTCD requires the city to establish an assessment or management method that is <br />27 <br />designed to maintain sign retroreflectivity at or above minimum levels specified in MN MUTCD <br />28 <br />Table 2A-3, which can be seen on page 2A-6 of the MN MUTCD, Chapter 2A: <br />29 <br />http://www.dot.state.mn.us/trafficeng/publ/mutcd/mnmutcd2014/mnmutcd-2a.pdf. <br />30 <br />The 2015 and 2018 compliance dates for replacement of signs that fail to meet minimum <br />31 <br />standards have been eliminated. However, cities still need to adopt a policy to replace traffic <br />32 <br />signs when they are worn out. Adopting a sign retroreflectivity policy will significantly reduce <br />33 <br />Page 1 of 2 <br /> <br />