My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02880
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2800
>
pf_02880
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:19:15 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:23:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2880
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
TWIN LAKES
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
844
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />house (her retirement house); will her house depreciate? She will not walk <br />around the Centre Pointe area when there is hotel and restaurant area, The <br />paths will only benfit the hotels, <br /> <br />Nancy Knutson, 1890 Brenner, asked that residents be heard. She encouraged <br />a quality of environment for residents in neighborhood, The residents area is <br />held hostage by Cleveland and Cty Rd, OJ expressed concern about traffic at <br />intersection, Direct traffic is to Cty Rd, C, Move hotels south, Brenner <br />residential traffic is a concern, Could streets be closed? <br /> <br />Don Albricht, 2053 Brenner, stated he was opposed and would not accept this <br />solution, <br /> <br />Mary Reed, Brenner Avenue, asked why hotels would be built to service <br />warehouses <br /> <br />Chairperson Keith Wietecki closed the hearing. <br /> <br />Member Ed Cunningham thanked the public for coming, He stated that he has <br />not seen a plan from the developer showing the hotels to the south, Why won't it <br />work? The developer should show compelling hardships, financial or othervvise <br /> <br />Chairperson Keith Wietecki stated that the compelling reasons for the location <br />would be a value statement: not an absolute answer, He expressed concern <br />about the nortn/south area change to the development: the hotels could be <br />moved further south, <br /> <br />Member Wilke stated that the hotel users from the north area will still enter from <br />County Rd D, There may not be much difference in traffic impact by relocating <br />the hotels The restaurants may not be a morning use area, BRW's report <br />explained many Improvements that could be made to handle traffic, <br /> <br />Chairperson Keith Wietecki asked for details on the driveways Assistant <br />Engineer Jay Kennedy recommended only 1 be considered at the far southeast <br />corner of the site, <br /> <br />Member Rhody asked for details on cellular towers, He stated that he was not <br />concerned with the lights and noise jf the hotels and restaurants do not operate <br />late evening (after 9:00pm). <br /> <br />Chairperson Keith Wietecki state that the Planning Commission could <br />recommend approval but with moving the hotels and restaurants to the south <br />because of noise and light: The north drive exits to the residential area at night <br /> <br />Member Thein stated he was concerned that residents do not know all of what <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.