Laserfiche WebLink
<br />the issues concerning their report. <br />10. On Tuesday, February 25, 1997, I received a telephone <br />call from Mr. Hunter and he indicated he had just seen my letter that <br />morning. He then stated that his comment to me on Friday, February 21, <br />that their study "did not meet anyone's standards", pertained to the <br />plagiarism aspect of their report, not necessarily to the content. <br />He then said that my letter of February 24 did raise legitimate <br />technical questions concerning their report that he would review and <br />consider. Then he informed me that he had been questioned by Roseville <br />City staff concerning the status of their report and had been asked <br />to meet with them that afternoon (February 25) to discuss the report. <br /> <br />AFFIANT SAYETH NOTHING FURTHER. <br /> <br /> <br />Subscribed and sworn to before me <br />this d,.Si\.-cray of February, 1997. <br /> <br />~~.~ <br /> <br />Notary Public <br /> <br />8 TIIDrHY... MllIOIf <br />NOTMY PUIUO. _IUOJA <br />IIftl .. ...._..._ <br />