My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02889
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2800
>
pf_02889
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:23:37 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:27:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2889
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
JAMES ADDITION
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1436
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />JAMES ADDITION NEIGHBORHOOD TASK FORCE <br />SUMMARY OF TASK FORCE CHARGES AND DELmERA TIONS TO DATE <br />BY Craig Christenson, Task Force chair, on 11/3/97 <br /> <br />1) GAIN KNOWLEDGE <br />Charge: What is the current "body of knowledge" regarding the water, traffic, and land <br />use problems that can be offered to residents and the city? There was a list of 5 points <br />regarding neighborhood positive features, land use, traffic issues, environmental <br />regulations and rights and responsibilities, <br /> <br />The Task Force has reviewed the neighborhoods' comments and are personally aware of at <br />least the major issues listed. Information has been collected rrom several sources on these <br />issues. Please refer to the attached meeting notes and the other items below. <br /> <br />2) RECOMMENDED CHANGES/IMPROVEMENTS <br />Charge: What are the specific issues to which changes should be considered (e.g. water <br />quality improvements, storm water storage or diversion, hours of operation, noise <br />restrictions, traffic lights, controlled access points, etc.)? <br /> <br />Health and Environment <br />Some neighbors expressed concern that there seemed an abnormally large number of <br />neighbors with cancers and questioned if this was true and due to the environment. <br /> <br />City staff reviewed this with John Soler, MN Dept. of Health, In summary, he did not feel <br />this neighborhood rate was unusual because in Minnesota an individual has a 50% (usually <br />1 %-5% due to environment) chance of being diagnosed with some type of cancer which <br />makes clusters very common, Aging neighborhoods would typically expect more cancers, <br />The drinking water is treated, tested and distributed throughout the St. Paul area and is <br />not considered a factor, Air pollution for this area is not considered abnormally high and <br />his records show no toxic waste dumps in the area. No further review is anticipated. <br /> <br />Storm Water: <br />There are concerns with the current adequacy and design of the storm water system and <br />retaining ponds, There is concern that additional development/redevelopment around the <br />neighborhood will exceed capacity, increase flooding onto Rose Place road which has <br />occurred in the past and increase the neighborhood basement water problems, <br /> <br />The city is requiring the current new development west of Fairview to install storm <br />ponding instead of draining directly to the storm ponding located in this neighborhood . <br />There have been some discussions on how to expand/improve this storm pond and add <br />others upstream, Further review is planned <br /> <br />Water in Basements' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.