Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ramsey County believes that Fairview may need to be widened in the distant future but <br />has no idea when. Apparently any planning would be several years away with <br />construction several years after that. Homes bordering Fairview will be further impacted <br />by any significant increased traffic and any future roadway widening. Those homeowners <br />need to be treated fairly. What mitigation or alternatives are possible and is it possible for <br />the County or City to plan for this? It is expected to be discussed further. <br /> <br />Oakcrest and Rose Place Traffic: <br />Traffic counts are not known. Speeding by neighbors and others is a concern and occurs <br />because the hills and straight roadway make is easy to go fast. The concept of traffic <br />calming changes have been discussed as a way to cause drivers to naturally reduce speeds. <br />Further discussion is anticipated. <br /> <br />3) RECOMMENDATIONS ON LAND USE ZONES <br />Charge: Should there be a change in land use zones in or near the neighborhood, and, if <br />so, why and to what other uses? <br /> <br />RehbeinlMatheson property at the southeast comer of County Road "C" and Fairview: <br />The city has recently purchased this property ITom Fairview up to and including the cold <br />storage building,. The owner had the property for sale and there apparently was interest in <br />developing it as commercial with Fairview Avenue ITontage. The city was proposing to <br />purchase it for seasonal storage and passive public uses and was considering <br />improvements. The task force agreed with city plans and that it should be purchased so it <br />could not be developed, <br /> <br />Entire Neighborhood: <br />The possibility of future commerciallbusiness development of the entire neighborhood has <br />always been rumored and pondered by the neighborhood, It has been reinforced by the <br />previous sale and redevelopment of two portions of this residential neighborhood into the <br />existing southern retail centers. However, it appears that an approximate cost of $20 <br />million to purchase the remaining 176 homes (43 acres) and the 3 businesses on these 71 <br />acres is likely too much to make commercial redevelopment economically feasible, The <br />limited traffic access on Snelling and Fairview may well be a negative for any <br />redevelopment. <br /> <br />Losing the adjoining neighbors and being surrounded by current and redeveloping business <br />fosters the concern about how the remaining neighborhood can continue to remain viable <br />and maintain property values, To date the neighborhood inftastructure and moderate <br />value homes have been well maintained and the number of homes sold per year has been <br />average. If not redeveloped in total, which most may not want, a clear direction to resolve <br />neighborhood problems and mitigate impacts is needed. <br />