Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />COSTCO WHOLE::.SAU::, INC., CASt: 1676 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />of streets, and quality landscaping, will attract other viable uses to the <br />area. <br /> <br />10. This phenomenon is somewhat akin to what happened when we struggled <br />to place a Target store in the Southdale area. The store was <br />successful and attracted a considerable amount of appropriate and <br />compatible addi tional devzlopment to the area to the south of Southdale <br />over a period of several years. <br /> <br />11. An important contribution on the part of the Costco proposal will be <br />the completion of Prior Avenue arid Mount Ridge Road. These <br />improvements will be made in accordance with City specifications, <br />including full curb and gutter from' County Road C to the north <br />extremity of the CasteD propert)'. This represents a significant <br />contribution to, the beginning of the process of opening up the properties <br />to the northwest and east. <br /> <br />12. The traffic generated by this facility will likely substantially increase <br />the volume of traffic on County Road C. In our opinion that traffic <br />will not in and of itself overload the street system. However, as other <br />business opportunities develop along County Road C, improvements to Its <br />capacity will be required. You will note in the site plan that the <br />access to the Costco devr:lopment will be via Prior Avenue and Mount <br />Ridge Road only. Thus, there will be no direct driveways onto County <br />Road C. We anticipate that, ultirnCitely, County Road C will be fully <br />divided with median strips from Interstate 35W to Snelling Avenue (and <br />beyond at both ends) providing for left turn movements principally at <br />public street access points. The Engineering Staff of the City concurs <br />that the accens proposed for the Costco' site is appropriate and <br />desirable. <br /> <br />13. The property is proposed to be rezoned from 1-1 to 8-4. The B-4 <br />district is a new district that was designed specifically for the higher <br />intensity uses proposed in the tax increment districts several years ago. <br />A significant feuture of this district is that a special UDe permit Is <br />required for site plan approval and 3 percent of the parking area ntWlt <br />be landncaped. Thene are the same standards that have been <br />successfully utilized in the 8-18 District where most of the restaurants <br />are located immediately west of RClsedale. <br /> <br /> <br />14. Therefore, we suggest that the iB-4 District proposed is the most <br />appropriate and restrictive district adaptable to this site and this area <br />of the City for the use proposf~cI. A team of real estate market <br />research people and city plannin9 consultants has been hired by the City <br />to review five areas of the Ci~y, one of which includes the area of the <br />property in question. Though we were not involved in that process and <br />had no knowledge of it being done, we met in our offices with <br />representatives of those companies to inform them of our opinions <br />regarding future land use, circulation roots, market potential, and other <br />ideas that we thought might be helpful to the studies. A preliminary <br />report regarding the Costco proposal has been submitted to the City by <br />these consultants as of a.bout the middle of the month. The results of <br />that initial study have not been made available to us, though the <br />Manager notes that it will be available prior to the Planning <br />Commission meeting. <br />