My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0721
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0721
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2014 3:24:45 PM
Creation date
8/12/2014 9:59:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/21/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 21, 2014 <br /> Page 16 <br /> the requested approval, with the exception of receipt of the park dedication fee in <br /> lieu of land. <br /> Councilmember McGehee expressed concern in the location of the wetland to lots <br /> and sought additional information on protections to prevent pollutants and provide <br /> a buffer along that wetland as part of this plan; and whether such stipulations <br /> could be included as part of the approval, or ensure conservation easements con- <br /> tinued to run with the lots. Councilmember McGehee also expressed concern <br /> with contamination of the wetland from lawn fertilizers. Councilmember McGe- <br /> hee also expressed concerns, from her personal viewing of the site, that adequate <br /> drainage for basements was regulated. <br /> Mr. Lloyd advised that, while he was unable to speak to non-public easements, <br /> there were setback requirements in place under various authorizing agencies to <br /> address the location of buildings and/or fences as well as for sidewalks, patios, <br /> and paved surfaces that were exclusive to properties adjacent to or abutting wet- <br /> lands. Mr. Lloyd further noted that a natural area buffer requirement also ad- <br /> dressed that issue; and whether enforcement was a function of City Code beyond <br /> the Zoning Code where it was not addressed, or whether it was a function of the <br /> Watershed District, all applicable setbacks and lot coverage requirements would <br /> be addressed by one or both of those regulating bodies during the permit process. <br /> While not addressing engineering requirements, Mr. Lloyd noted that the City's <br /> Zoning C ode provided a minimum requirement for floor elevations to ensure <br /> basements or the lowest level of a structure was at a minimum of 2' above the wa- <br /> ter table to address drainage concerns. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, City Engineer Marc Culver con- <br /> firmed that the City could access the lots to address any pooling or drainage prob- <br /> lems in the future. At the request of Mayor Roe, Mr. Lloyd confirmed that drain- <br /> age easements would be in place accordingly. <br /> Councilmember Etten expressed his appreciation for including a master agree- <br /> ment for maintenance of common areas (e.g. rain basins) on the front end as de- <br /> velopers work with staff to make consideration for that and have those elements <br /> included in an agreement. Councilmember Etten questioned the short- and long- <br /> term plans for the berm shown in the NE corner and discussions held at the Plan- <br /> ning Commission level; and whether it would eventually go away. <br /> Mr. Lloyd advised that it was not intended that it would go away, but probably <br /> not be a very significant berm in the end, as described during Planning Commis- <br /> sion public comments and deliberations. Mr. Lloyd reviewed the purpose of the <br /> berm based on the challenges in developing this site due to traditionally poor <br /> soils. However, with new engineering technologies today, Mr. Lloyd advised that <br /> the developer was confident they could work with those soils; but other than haul- <br /> ing them away during the construction process, those soils could be bermed and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.