Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment D <br />designation would also allow LIMITED manufacturing processes and distribution, but not the <br />magnitude of former light industrial district allowances. <br />Chair Gisselquist noted that it would not allow housing any longer, even though not developing <br />as HDR today, with that original purpose intended to step down zones and density to the north <br />from residential to apartments or other HDR, then into industrial zones. Chair Gisselquist <br />questioned if this would preclude anyone from coming forward with a multi-tenant building <br />overlooking Oasis Park. <br />Mr. Paschke responded that they could still do so, as this designation created greater flexibility. <br />At the request of Member Cunningham, Mr. Paschke confirmed that there was currently in <br />process at 2785 Fairview Avenue N a proposal for HDR by Sherman and Associates, which <br />would be coming before the City Council in the near future for their consideration. Mr. Paschke <br />noted that staff continued to hear from potential developers in other portions of the Twin Lakes <br />area, and everything remained open to discussion. <br />Public Comment <br />Lisa McCormick <br />Ms. McCormick stated that she wanted to go on record that she had some concerns with the <br />proposed rezoning, but had no good solutions for the Commission to consider at this time. <br />However, Ms. McCormick expressed her concerns in moving to CMU, while providing more <br />flexibility and permitted uses, it also seemed to provide less control for the City to monitor uses <br />going in there, and seemed more lenient for other bordering uses and park properties or <br />commercial office uses. <br />Ms. McCormick advised that her biggest concern is the small residential area on the north, and <br />suggested carving out something to provide a Conditional Use situation or something allowing <br />the City more control in evaluating uses. <br />Chair Gisselquist closed Public Hearing at approximately 10:18 p.m., with no one else <br />appearing for or against. <br />MOTION <br />Member Murphy moved, seconded by Member Boguszewski to recommend to the City <br />Council APPROVAL of the proposed COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MAP CHANGE <br />AND ZONING MAP CHANGE, pursuant to Title 2 (Commissions), Title 10 (Zoning) and <br />Title 11 (Subdivisions) of Roseville City Code, for the following addressed properties <br />within the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area: 1633 – 1776 Terrace Drive (along the north <br />side of Terrace Drive adjacent to Oasis Park); 2830 Fairview Avenue (at the north corner <br />of Terrace Drive and Fairview Avenue); 2805 – 2823, 2825, and 2833 – 2837 Fairview <br />Avenue (the west side of Fairview Avenue adjacent to Langton Lake Park); and based on <br />the comments and findings of Sections 4 - 6, and recommendation of Section 7 of the <br />staff report dated June 4, 2014. <br />Member Cunningham questioned if the concerns expressed by Ms. McCormick were valid and if <br />the City was indeed losing some of its discretion on future uses; and asked that staff review the <br />process for a building and/or use and who would be the responsible party in setting those <br />guidelines with this proposed motion. <br />Specific to uses, Mr. Paschke noted that many of the current uses in this area were pre-existing <br />conditions (e.g. warehouse south of Acorn) limiting what could be done even if the Zoning <br />Ordinance changed. Mr. Paschke noted that the buildings were limited in use, had only so <br />much capacity, and were not zoned currently for retail, but or similar uses such as the “Bridging” <br />operation, and use as Warehouse/Distribution, or Production/Processing, similar to the “Pour <br />Decisions” brewery use previously in that area. <br /> <br />