My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014_0818_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2014
>
2014_0818_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2014 4:02:47 PM
Creation date
8/14/2014 1:54:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment D <br />EJ4,2014,RPCM <br />XTRACT OF THE UNEOSEVILLE LANNING OMMISSION INUTES <br />d. PROJECT FILE 0026, Twin Lakes Re-Envisioning <br />Request by the Community Development Department for approval of COMPREHENSIVE <br />LAND USE PLAN MAP CHANGE AND ZONING MAP CHANGE for the following addressed <br />properties within the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area: <br />1633 – 1776 Terrace Drive (along the north side of Terrace Drive adjacent to Oasis <br />Park) <br />2830 Fairview Avenue (at the north corner of Terrace Drive and Fairview Avenue) <br />2805 – 2823, 2825, and 2833 – 2837 Fairview Avenue (the west side of Fairview <br />Avenue adjacent to Langton Lake Park) <br />Chair Gisselquist opened the Public Hearing for Planning File 14-009 at approximately 10:05 <br />p.m. <br />City Planner Thomas Paschke reviewed the request for proposed changes, as detailed in the <br />staff report dated June 4, 2014, and Attachment B. <br />Mr. Paschke reviewed the area north of Terrace Drive, which had been designated High Density <br />Residential (HDR) in the past to serve as a buffer between single-family residential and park <br />properties and business/commercial sues in the CMU District. However, over time and with <br />other challenges, in addition to the requirement for an Interim Use for a unique situation as <br />previously addressed tonight, Mr. Paschke advised that a number of non-conforming issues had <br />come up, making management of that HDR designation more difficult each year and with those <br />properties still not ripe for redevelopment. <br />Mr. Paschke advised that the City Council had expressed their preference for no more than one <br />CMU designation beyond the current one, but were of one mind that all of the Twin Lakes <br />Redevelopment Area should be afforded the same flexibility for residential, commercial or light <br />industrial uses. Therefore, Mr. Paschke advised that the City Council determined that re- <br />designation of the property to CMU would better serve the community and allow for future <br />redevelopment for which the creation of the Twin Lakes and CMU area had been created for. <br />Therefore, Mr. Paschke noted the request to change HDR to CMU in that area, and change the <br />Zoning designation of the same HDR-1 to CMU as well, and staff’s support for those <br />recommended changes. <br />Mr. Paschke summarized the open house held by staff related to this request, as detailed in <br />Attachment C to the RCA. <br />At the request of Member Murphy, Mr. Paschke opined that before the subject properties were <br />zoned HDR, with existing non-conforming uses, they were zoned Light Industrial to the best of <br />his recollection; and that most parcels within the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area were <br />designated as some type of light industrial, but not heavy industrial. <br />Mr. Lloyd displayed a zoning map – pre-2010 rezoning – showing General Industrial or Light <br />Industrial, with several businesses designated Office Park and PUD; with the area immediately <br />below Oasis Park (grey area) designated Light Industrial. <br />Member Murphy noted that to-date there had been no development interest in this subject <br />property toward HDR. <br />Mr. Paschke noted that Light Industrial designation allowed for many different industrial uses; <br />and clarified that the intent in this change in designation was not seeking to move into that <br />realm, with only two uses to-date approaching the City with the intent for production/processing <br />and/or warehousing/distribution, both defined as light in City Code. Mr. Paschke noted that this <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.