pf_02914 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

2.3 A blanket variance for the driveway on this property was granted in 1992 in conjunction with roadway improvement project number 92-02-72. 2.4 Section 1004.01A, City Code, states that no accessory building shall be located within any yard other than the rear yard except for a through lot where it shall be located in the side yard. A minimum side yard setback of five feet is also required for an accessory building. 2.5 Boulevard parking spaces are those parking spaces which do not extend at least 20 feet onto the property. Section 602.06 of the City Code prohibits boulevard parking adjacent to a public street. Boulevard parking spaces existing as of June 30, 1984, have been allowed to continue until roadway improvements involving disturbance or removal of the boulevard parking area are undertaken. JJ1 MINOR VARIANCE COMMITTEE 3.1 The request for the variance included the required application form, sketch of the property and proposed garage, written statement from the applicant, and written approval from the adjacent property owners affected by the variance (David Cmiel at 478 North McCarrons Boulevard W, Mike Dahlin at 460 North McCarrons Boulevard W, and Richard Jones at 478 Bayview Drive W). 3.2 The Minor Variance Committee reviewed this request on June 2, 1997, and unanimously recommended approval of a minor variance to reduce the setbacks of an accessory building to five feet from the front property line along Bayview Drive Wand less than one foot from the side property line to replace a detached garage at 470 North McCarrons Boulevard W, based on the following findings: 1. The property at 470 North McCarrons Boulevard W has frontage on North McCarrons Boulevard Wand Bayview Drive W; therefore, it is classified as a through lot. 2. A detached garage could not be placed within the side yard because of the location of the house in the center of the parcel. 3. The replacement garage will be the same size as the existing garage and will not encroach further into established set back lines. 4. There is no other practical location for a garage, either detached or attached, on the property. 5. The proposed variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Title 10 of the City Code (Zoning). 6. The variance, if granted, will not adversely affect the public health, safety, or general welfare. PF#2914 - RCA - Page 2 of 3