My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0811
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0811
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2014 2:23:51 PM
Creation date
8/19/2014 10:01:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/11/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, August 11, 2014 <br /> Page 6 <br /> Councilmember McGehee questioned if the original budget parameters were set <br /> too low, since three of the original five bids had failed on further testing; opining <br /> that this may prevent qualified vendors from performing the work based on their <br /> expertise and knowledge of actual costs for doing so. <br /> Mr. Brokke advised, that if authorized to re-solicit proposals, several items identi- <br /> fied previously within initial budgets, would be identified as alternates for better <br /> analysis, as their cost was higher than originally anticipated, specifically at Lex- <br /> ington and Autumn Grove Parks. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated that she supported this initiative to make the sys- <br /> tems more efficient and not waste water; however, she further stated that she <br /> didn't want to spend $200,000 or more on a system that forced vendors to cut <br /> corners, ultimately costing the City more in the long run. <br /> Councilmember Willmus asked Mr. Brokke to provide background on vendors, <br /> specifically the chosen vendor who was unable to meet the three-year bonding re- <br /> quirements for the duration of the project. Councilmember Willmus further asked <br /> if it was possible to repackage the project to break up the scope of work so several <br /> vendors could qualify. <br /> Mr. Brokke advised that the preferred vendor was a small business, and were only <br /> able to bond for one year at a time, while state law indicated bonding was neces- <br /> sary over the duration of the three-year project. Regarding breaking up the scope <br /> of the work among vendors, Mr. Brokke advised that the intent was for one ven- <br /> dor to allow for consistency of the system. <br /> McGehee moved, Willmus seconded, rejecting all irrigation replacement and up- <br /> grade proposals as described on the Best Value Summary dated March 17, 2014; <br /> and as detailed in the RCA dated August 11, 2014. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Willmus, Laliberte, Etten, McGehee, and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> j. Set Public Hearing to Consider Approving a Small Brewer Off-Sale Intoxi- <br /> cating Liquor License, an On-Sale and Sunday Brewer's Taproom License <br /> and an Outside Sales and Consumption Endorsement for Blume Brauhaus, <br /> LLC (Bent Brewstillery) located at 1744 Terrace Drive <br /> Mayor Roe recognized that this applicant is attempting to get licenses in place <br /> prior to this year's Minnesota State Fair, His research had indicated no state or <br /> city code requiring a separate action of the City Council to set a public hearing <br /> date. Given the staff time in providing Requests for Council Action, Mayor Roe <br /> questioned if it was necessary for this extra step. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.