Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3. The proposed use of the property for a commercial communications tower <br />will be compatible with contiguous properties. <br /> <br />4. The proposed use of the property for a commercial communications tower <br />will not have an adverse impact on the market value of contiguous <br />properties. <br /> <br />5. The proposed use of the property for a commercial communications tower <br />will not have an adverse impact on the general public health, safety and <br />welfare. <br /> <br />6. The proposed use of the property for a commercial communications tower <br />is consistent with the City of Roseville Comprehensive Plan's Business <br />designation. <br /> <br />7. The applicant has adequately explained why it is not technically feasible to <br />located the proposed antenna on an City tower site. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the <br />City of Roseville, Minnesota (the "City"), Ramsey County, Minnesota, that a conditional use <br />permit to allow the placement of a 90 foot monopole commercial communications tower on <br />a non-City tower site at 2582 Long Lake Road be approved subject to the following <br />conditions: <br /> <br />1. The applicant must demonstrate the service area for the proposed antenna <br />in this location versus a City tower site. <br /> <br />2. The applicant must demonstrate why it is not technically feasible to meet the <br />requirements of the code and integrate such antennas or add them to an <br />existing cellular or water tower. <br /> <br />3. The applicant must provide space for up to three additional users on the <br />proposed tower or demonstrate why it is not technically feasible to do so. <br /> <br />4. The monopole must be setback a minimum of 30 feet the east property line <br />and a minimum of ten feet from the south property line. <br /> <br />5. The monopole must be removed by the owner within twelve months after it <br />is no longer in use. A bond may be required from the owner by the city to <br />assure that the tower is removed within twelve months. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by <br />Council Member ---- and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br /> <br />Resolution _ - Page 2 of 3 <br />