My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02939
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2900
>
pf_02939
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:24:22 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:53:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2939
Planning Files - Type
Minor Variance
Address
2958 WOODBRIDGE ST
Applicant
ROELLER, BERNARD
PIN
012923140016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />2.3 This property was platted prior to 1959; therefore, a side yard setback of five feet <br />is required. In order to comply with building codes and setback requirements, the <br />new garage will be constructed at least six feet from the house and at least five feet <br />from the south property line. <br /> <br />2.4 Section 1004.01A, City Code, states, "no accessory building shall be erected or <br />located within any yard other than the rear yard except for a through lot when it shall <br />be located in the side yard." <br /> <br />3J2 MINOR VARIANCE COMMITTEE <br /> <br />3.1 The request for the variance included the required application form, sketch of the <br />property and proposed garage, written statement from the applicant, and written <br />approval from the adjacent property owners affected by the variance (Roger <br />Loveland and Debra Amlee-Loveland at 2950 Woodbridge Street N). <br /> <br />3.2 The Minor Variance Committee reviewed this request on July 22, 1997, and <br />unanimously recommended approval of a minor variance to allow the placement of <br />a two car detached garage in the side yard and in line with the existing house at <br />2958 Woodbridge Street, based on the following findings: <br /> <br />1. The existing one car garage is located approximately two feet from the north <br />property line and the existing driveway is approximately three feet over the <br />north property line. A 20" retaining wall in this location and the narrow width <br />of the driveway results in the accumulation of snow in this area and makes <br />it difficult to access the garage. <br /> <br />2. The new garage will be constructed in line with the front of the house on the <br />property; however, the garage cannot be attached because of the location <br />of required egress windows on the south side of the house. <br /> <br />3. There is no other practical location for a garage, either detached or attached, <br />on the property. In order to place the garage in the rear yard on the south <br />side of the parcel, an existing patio area would need to be reconstructed. <br /> <br />4. The width of the driveway will not exceed 26 feet at the property line. <br /> <br />5. The proposed variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of <br />the City's Comprehensive Plan and Title 10 of the City Code (Zoning). <br /> <br />6. The variance, if granted, will not adversely affect the public health, safety, or <br />general welfare. <br /> <br />PF#2939 - RCA - Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.