Laserfiche WebLink
City of <br />RRIbISHVHnIE Tax Increment Financing (TIF) <br />Minuemts, USA Overview (January, 2006) <br />What is TIF? <br />Tax Increment Financing, or TIF, is a financing tool that is designed to advance public <br />development. TIF was first introduced in 1946, but was not widely used until the 1970's, when <br />many federally assisted housing and urban development programs were phased out. Later, in <br />1979, the MN Legislature created the Tax Increment Financing Act. The TIF Act, while <br />amended numerous times, remains the basis of all TIF use today. <br />Tax increment is the difference between the property taxes paid on a parcel of land before <br />development, and the increased property taxes created by the new development. The additional, <br />or incremental, property taxes are used to pay for the extraordinary costs of the new <br />development. <br />Public Purpose and `But For' Test <br />In order for TIF to be used, a jurisdiction must establish a public purpose and meet what is called <br />the `but for' test. The public purposes for which TIF can be used include, but are not limited to; <br />creating jobs, redeveloping blighted areas, constructing affordable housing, or cleaning up <br />contaminated soils. <br />The primary objective of TIF is to encourage certain types of development or redevelopment that <br />would not normally occur without the use of TIF. It must be established that `But for' the use of <br />TIF, the project would not occur. <br />Why is TIF Needed? <br />TIF is needed when the marketplace is unwilling to provide the desired development or <br />redevelopment. As an example, let's assume the City has a particular area with two lots adjacent <br />to each other. The first lot contains a viable business that pays $5,500 in annual property taxes. <br />The second lot contains some contaminated soils and remains vacant of any business because the <br />general marketplace has determined that the soil cleanup costs would make it cost -prohibitive to <br />develop. To explain why lot #2 is cost -prohibitive to develop, a hypothetical example is shown <br />below. <br />In this example, the presence of contaminated soils results in a net loss to the developer — hence <br />they would not normally develop the lot `but for' the presence of public assistance. If the City is <br />willing to pay for the soil cleanup costs, the development would be more likely to occur. <br />www.cityofroseville. com Page' of <br />`Clean'Lot <br />Contaminated Lot <br />Cost to purchase the lot <br />$ 100,000 <br />$ 100,000 <br />Soil cleanup costs <br />- <br />50,000 <br />Development/construction costs <br />1,000,000 <br />1,000,000 <br />Total costs <br />$ 1,100,000 <br />$ 1,150,000 <br />Estimated resale value of the lot <br />1,125,000 <br />1,125,000 <br />Net profit loss) <br />$25,000 <br />($25,000) <br />In this example, the presence of contaminated soils results in a net loss to the developer — hence <br />they would not normally develop the lot `but for' the presence of public assistance. If the City is <br />willing to pay for the soil cleanup costs, the development would be more likely to occur. <br />www.cityofroseville. com Page' of <br />