Laserfiche WebLink
City of <br />�" Tax Increment Financing (TIF) <br />Minnesota, USA Overview <br />How does TIF Work? <br />As noted above, tax increment is the difference between the existing property taxes paid on a <br />parcel of land before development, and the increased property taxes created by the new <br />development. In the example above, lot #2 pays taxes only on the land, say $500. However, it is <br />known that if the lot is developed similar to lot #1, it too will pay $5,500 annually in taxes. <br />Now let's assume that the City creates a TIF district to clean up lot #2, and agrees to reimburse <br />the developer for the $50,000 in soil cleanup costs. This gives the developer the necessary <br />incentive to go forward with the project. How does the City come up with the $50,0009 From <br />the additional (or incremental) property taxes that are now paid by the newly developed lot. The <br />example below demonstrates how TIF works. <br />Before Development After Development <br />Property tax paid on the land $ 500 $ 500 <br />Property tax paid on the building - 5 000 <br />Total property tax $ 500 $ 5,500 <br />In this example, after the development is created an additional $5,000 in property taxes is <br />generated. The additional taxes are captured each year for ten years, and remitted to the <br />developer. <br />Is TIF Good or Bad? <br />Whether the use of TIF is good or bad depends on the desires of the community. If the <br />community desires to clean up contaminated soils, remove blighted areas, or create affordable <br />housing, TIF may be a viable solution. If the community is willing to accept what the <br />marketplace will bear, TIF may not be appropriate. The list of advantages and disadvantages of <br />TIF is long and varied. <br />In the example above, the City paid the developer $50,000. Was this a good investment? Again, <br />it depends. Some would argue that the City shouldn't have provided this `public subsidy'. <br />Others would suggest, that `but for' the development, the City wouldn't have had the $50,000 in <br />the first place. Similar ideological differences exist when trying to compare the development's <br />long-term benefits with the long-term public costs. <br />Above all else, the desires of the community should remain a priority when determining whether <br />to use TIF. <br />www.cityofroseville. com Pare 2 of 2 <br />