Laserfiche WebLink
<br />_v.<~.""~~,,",,,,_,~~ ~ <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />* * * * * * * * <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City <br />of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held on the 12th day of January, <br />1998, at 6:30 p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: Mastel, Maschka, Goedeke,Wiski,Wall <br />and the following members were absent: None <br /> <br />Council Member Wi ski introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 9510 <br />RESOLUTION GRANTING A SETBACK VARIANCE AT <br />2416 LEXINGTON AVENUE NORTH <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Section 1004.03(D) of the Roseville City Code requires an attached <br />garage to be set back a minimum of 20 feet from the rear property line and 10 feet from <br />the side property line; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Frederick Chute has requested a variance to reduce the setback of <br />an attached garage to three feet from the rear property line and four feet from the side <br />property line at 2416 Lexington Avenue North, said property being legally described as <br />Lot 1, Block 1, Michels-Sheets Evergreen Estates; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on <br />the request on Wednesday, December 10,1997, and recommended approval of the <br />requested variance; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council received the Planning Commission's <br />recommendation on Monday, January 12, 1998; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council made the following findings: <br /> <br />1. Section 1004.03(D)(4) of the City Code requires a side yard setback of 10 <br />feet and a rear yard setback of 30 feet for an interior lot in an R-2 zoning <br />district. The existing house is setback 22 feet from the rear property line, <br />25.5 feet from the north side lot line and 32 feet from the south side lot <br />line. <br /> <br />2. The topography of the parcel limits options for relocating the driveway to <br />the south side of the parcel and creates a practical difficulty for the <br />applicant. <br /> <br />3. The location of a mature coniferous tree on the south side of the parcel <br />creates a practical difficulty for the applicant. <br /> <br />Resolution 9510 - Page 1 of 2 <br />