My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02978
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2900
>
pf_02978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:27:19 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:56:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2978
Planning Files - Type
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
EVEREST
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
374
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />3.5 OvefView. The factors affecting the City's decision to designate these parcels as <br />Medium Density Residential have not changed since 1994. The Everest-Hamline <br />Avenue site is an excellent site for medium or higher density housing, especially <br />multi-family housing, because of the proximity to residential neighborhoods, for <br />active senior or empty nester professional with in-home office residents. Some of <br />these residents do want to remain in the community or neighborhood, but are <br />seeking alternative living accommodations from a single family detached home. In <br />addition to being near existing residential areas, the Everest-Hamline site provides <br />medical and dental care and banks within one to two blocks, access to transit near <br />the site, a community library and meeting room adjacent to the site, shopping within <br />six blocks, and schools and churches within two to four blocks. Another amenity, a <br />public golf course, is three blocks to the north. Finally, the site is close to a nursing <br />home, should a resident's partner need this type of care. <br /> <br />4.0 SITE SPECIFIC ISSUES <br /> <br />4.1 Traffic and Utility Impact. See the attached report from Jay Kennedy, Assistant <br />Public Works Director (dated 01/07/98). <br /> <br />4.2 Physical Impact. For illustration purposes, a generalized comparison ofthe physical <br />size of a medium density housing project versus a limited business project was <br />completed. The site is composed of 139,400 square feet (3.2 acres). <br /> <br />~~:~;:;:~:iWMii"~~::?9:;:;~:;W~~H?~~~mM@MMi:l\%i~~~;~$lmm r!.I~{lllilll,III'illjrl~li ~111IjI1111Iilij)~JJ!:~11~\fi't'j1;!il~I:J <br />.'.mr'..iifQflSrts..J.m...tnVetns.... ..,... <br />ilil:;~M+. :~:~:~;~~~~:;:~~~::~~;~:;:;;!~~::~:::;~~::~:~;:J~::R~~?-;:?~~:~~::~:~::~~~:~i::~:~:;.:i;~}~~ili~ <br />Number buildings or units 32 units on 3.2 acre site, 1-50,000 s.f. office bldg., <br /> 1 ,600 s.f. each, one story; 3 stories, <br /> 51 ,000 s.f. foot print 17,000 s.f. footprint <br />Height or stories allowed Usually townhome height Usually 2 to 4 office <br /> of 2.5 to 3 res.stories (28' stories, requiring elevators <br /> to 44' with peaked roof) (22' to 45' with fiat roof) <br />Paved parking surface 2 per unit plus drives, 5 per 1 ,000 s.f. of office at <br />based on use 1 ,000 s.t. per unit; 300 s.f. /space; estimate <br /> estimate 32,000 s.f. total 75,000 s.f. total -could be <br /> ramped to red uce size <br />Ponding (by Rice Creek) 5 -10% of site (14,000 s.f.) 5 -1 0% of site (14,000 s.t) <br />Green space retained 43,000 s.f 34,000 sJ, <br /> <br />In summary, the residential designated site has more roof area, less height, less <br />paved surface, but more green space than a limited business designated site. <br />Parking, auto noise, lighting, exhaust air would be closer to the Dellwood residents <br />of the site was designated for limited business. <br /> <br />PF#2978 - (01/14/98) - Page 7 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.