Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4.3 Financial Impacts. The applicant suggests that an office project on the Everest site <br />would enhance the residential property values to the east along Dellwood because <br />the office and its landscaping would create a buffer and transition to residential <br />uses. Staff review for past projects indicates that high quality projects with well <br />done site planning and landscape buffering do not decrease values of adjoining <br />residential properties. The City decision to designate this site for medium density <br />housing did include a review and discussion of changes in value along borders <br />between commercial and/or industrial properties and residential uses. Where <br />possible, the City policy has been to use natural landmarks, streets, parks, or open <br />spaces and (as a last resort) additional man-made buffers or transitions between <br />uses to help mitigate the direct impact of a commerciallindustrial property on <br />adjoining homes. <br /> <br />By purposefully choosing a residential land use designation for this area along <br />Hamline, the City understood that the maximization of property taxes on this site <br />was not the only criteria for a better mix of community land uses. Hence, appraisals <br />were not used to determine ultimate or highest and best return from a property sales <br />or property tax basis - if this had been the adopted strategy, every minor arterial <br />would be filled with office buildings and fast food restaurants. <br /> <br />The Everest proposal estimates approximately 50,000 s.f. of building on three <br />levels. Staff estimated a minimum value of $85/s.1.; the building would have a <br />market value of $4,250,000, generating between $190,000 and $260,000 in new <br />property taxes annually, of which 40% would be contributed to the area-wide fiscal <br />disparity pool. Assuming no tax increment assistance, the annual net new property <br />taxes would range from $114,000 to $156,000. The City would receive <br />approximately 12% or $14,000 to $19,000 annually. (The School District would <br />receive approximately 53%, the County approximately 28%.) Estimating the <br />property taxes of a 32 unit senior housing project (10 units per acre on 3.2 acres) <br />is more of a challenge. However, if a rental housing project pays full taxes, and the <br />average property tax per unit is $1,200 annually, the net new property taxes would <br />be approximately $38,400. (By way of comparison, six new single family homes <br />valued at $130,000 would generate approximately $17,000 annually in net new <br />property taxes,) <br /> <br />4.4 Land Use/Zoning Impacts. If the Comprehensive Plan land use designation for <br />these seven parcels is changed from Medium Density Residential to Limited <br />Business, rezoning of the property to B1, Limited Business, would be forthcoming. <br />A recently passed State law requires consistency between the comprehensive plan <br />land use designations and the zoning of the property by the end of 1998. If there <br />is an inconsistency, the comprehensive plan's land use designation prevails. For <br />this reason, the proposed change in the comprehensive plan land use designation <br />is a de facto rezoning. Even if the applicant did not pursue a rezoning of the <br />property, it would automatically convert to a B1 zoning district on January 1, 1999. <br /> <br />PF#2978 ~ (01/14/98) ~ Page 8 of 11 <br />