My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02978
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2900
>
pf_02978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:27:19 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:56:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2978
Planning Files - Type
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
EVEREST
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
374
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />claims they did not get the fax; our staff does not keep verification slips for each fax so <br />we had no proof of it being sent or rejected. <br /> <br />November 17, 1997. Assuming he had received the fax, I called Tim Nelson on another <br />matter - to let him know that I had found his comprehensive plan change application for <br />the Hamtine Avenue site to be incomplete. The Everest request to be on the Planning <br />Commission hearing for December, 1997 would have to be set off to January, 1998 in <br />order for Everest to submit a complete application. Everest had not spoken with the city <br />planner but had simply faxed and sent in the application. (November 17, 1997 was the <br />10th day and last day in which to review completeness under the state statute. The <br />application was an outdated form, did not have a complete legal description or <br />narrative, mailing list, or building/site drawings except for the sketched received earlier <br />in the fall. Mailed and faxed copies were sent to Mr. Nelson by me. (Kim Lee, our city <br />planner, was sick with the flu this day. She would normally handle incomplete <br />applications like this.) <br /> <br />November 17, 1997. The Council work session at which I asked the Council for <br />direction (as per memo of 11/17/97). I asked the Council for direction on the three <br />issues; a change in land use, a change in the policy of commercial expansion, and a <br />tax increment policy change. I think the Council may have misunderstood my request <br />and thought it was a direct Everest request, but wondered aloud why Everest was not <br />present. <br /> <br />November 18, 1997. Tim Nelson called to ask why the Everest case had been <br />discussed by the Council. I was surprised and felt "set up" by him because he even <br />admitted that he received the mailed notice on Monday before the meeting but did not <br />open it or somehow left it on his desk. He accused staff of trying to deceive Everest and <br />create a negative meeting by notifying surrounding neighbors. In fact, staff had not <br />notified them either in writing or by phone; they started calling staff Monday wondering <br />what was on the agenda by Everest and when. I responded by explaining the concept <br />and the need for further staff direction before any hearings were held. Kim also talked <br />to Tim Nelson and sent him another copy of the agenda and the packet from November <br />17, 1997. <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.