My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02978
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2900
>
pf_02978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:27:19 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:56:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2978
Planning Files - Type
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
EVEREST
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
374
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />January 14,1998. Nelson provided a list (dated 1/12/98) of 50 office or commerical <br />buildings adjacent to single family residences, claiming that this placement of business <br />was accepted practice in Roseville. Numerous mischaracterizations of the land use in <br />the list of 50 were noted by staff. It is precisely because of some of these poorly sited <br />projects adjacent to single family housing that the Vista 2000 and Comprehensive Plan <br />stated no further incursion into residential areas would be acceptable. <br /> <br />January 12, 1998. Letter of oppostion to the project from Eric Kwok, 2225 Dellwood. <br /> <br />January 13, 1998. Linda Owen article in Pioneer Press describing issues. <br /> <br />January 14, 1998. Planning Commission meeting and staff report dated 1/14/98 in <br />which staff recommends upholding the current comprehensive plan and denying the <br />request to change the designation on the site from residential to business. <br /> <br />January 14, 1998. Benshoof Traffic Report for Everest - presented and distributed at <br />the Planning Commission meeting, including reports from 1987 consultant report. <br /> <br />January 16, 1998. (via fax and mail) Everest letter of withdrawal stating the staff and <br />City Council are "...intent on discrediting and disadvantaging Everest, rather than <br />providing a neutral forum for judging a redevelopment opportunity on its merits" and <br />that staff "leaked" information to Council members. Everest again asserted that staff <br />lied to them about faxes and that staff was not unbiased and disregarded 1986 through <br />1992 information submitted as part of application; the staff traffic report was speculative <br />and deficient - Everest used 1985 data in their report; and staff "manipulation of the <br />planning process" to avoid a fair and neutral hearing of the Everest application on its <br />merits". Everest claims its application was well supported by planning principles (1986 <br />through 1992)but with no mention of the current comprehensive plan. Everest/Nelson <br />misconstrued what Planning Commission Member John Thein had said about being a <br />"pawn" in a planning contest. Everest stated there is favoritism and special treatment. <br /> <br />January 21, 1998. Everest withdrawlletter was faxed to the Planning Commission by <br />staff because they were mentioned in letter. <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.