My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02986
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2900
>
pf_02986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:27:57 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:57:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2986
Planning Files - Type
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Address
3090 CLEVELAND AVE N
Applicant
SCHREIER, JIM AND DEB
PIN
042923220008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
386
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br />GEER P,L.L,P.= <br /> <br />ATTORNEYS. AT. LAW <br /> <br />4200 MULTIFOODS TOWER <br />33 SOUTH SIXTH STREET <br />MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 <br />TELEPHONE: (61 2) 338-0661 <br />FACSIMILE: (612) 338-8384 <br /> <br />Some Membm Also~ OJ Pn:.:Dc. L:.w in~, Narrh Dakora, <br />WISCUI1Sin, Kansas, Missouri, Connecticw, N.w York, Texas """ Ca/ifi;mia <br /> <br />Dil-ect Dial No.: (612) 347-9105 <br />Internet KYEAGER@meagher.com <br /> <br />January] 5, ] 999 <br /> <br />Dennis Welsch <br />City of Roseville <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville, MN 55113 <br /> <br />Re: City of Roseville/Charles Cabinet Company, Inc. <br />Planned Unit Development Agreement <br />Our File No. 53684-1 <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Welsch: <br /> <br />This office represents the developer, in reference to the proposed Planned Unit Develqpment Agreement. I <br />have reviewed, the same and recommend that the following ,revisions and clarifications be made to the <br />Agreement., .. ,,', , , <br /> <br />1. I presume that the ordinance effectively rezoning the property to the proposed PUD will not <br />be proposed to the City Council unless the Planned Unit Development Agreement is signed by the Schreiers. <br />If! am wrong, please add to paragraph 1 the additional requirement that the Schreiers must also sign the PUD <br />before the Agreement will be effective. <br /> <br />2. In the event the exhibits address items not specifically addressed in thePUD agreement, the <br />exhibits should govern with respect to those items. Accordingly, please add the following to the end of the <br />third sentence of paragraph 4: <br /> <br />, to the extent items referenced or identified in the exhibits are not specifically <br />addressed in this Agreement. <br /> <br />3. With respect to paragraph 8.6: In light of the pathway payment in lieu of construction payment <br />that, will be made by Charles Cabinet Company, it would not be appropriate for the City to assess the property <br />for, that,-impro,:ement if at some time in the. future the sid{)walJ< c,onstIl,lc_t~on qecow.es, part. of a city <br />improvement project. ,In order to ,prevent a.douJJle payment. by our client ,or itss4cc:~s~or~ please add the <br />following to the end of this paragraph: '. . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.