pf_02986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

5. With proper conditions and mitigation, the orderly expansion of the existing use (Charles Cabinet) may not adversely affect the public health, safety, or general welfare. The adjoining and nearby residential property owners have supported Mr, Schreier's proposal as not being a nuisance use to their residential area. (No comments were received opposing Schreier's request.) 6. If designed properly, the buildings along this entire east side of Cleveland could be a noise and visual buffer of residential uses to the east. This strip of homes facing Cleveland should be planned for collectively, while providing the property owners with assurance that it is their decision to change land uses. There is a need in the community for land on which small owner occupied offices and shops can be dev'eloped, Changing the land use ,designation of these parcels in the Comprehensive Plan would facilitate the redevelopment of these parcels for other uses. 7, There is currently land area (including all properties owned by the applicant) for the on-site parking and capacity for the traffic and utility system to serve the proposed change in use. To provide 31 parking spaces, the applicant must designate parking on both the south and north parcels. Including the Schreier's residential parcel in the PUD will also ensure that there will be adequate area for parking if the use on the Charles Cabinet parcel is expanded or changed. The home could remain on the site and a cross parking easment with parking improvements triggered by a "proof of parking" requirement in the PUD 5.0 STAFF RECOMMENDA TlON L/..~/",. I 5.1 Based on tz; ~~ackground description in Section 2 and the findings outlined in Section 3.1 of this report, staff recommends the following: 1. Recommend approval of a comprehensive plan amendment for the two parcels owned by Jim and Deb Schreier (Charles Cabinet parcel and residential parcel to the north) from Low Density Residential to Business, 2. '2 Recommend approval of a concept plan for a planned unit development (and rezoning from R-1 to PUD~B) on the two parcels owned by Jim and Deb Schreier (Charles Cabinet parcel and residential parcel to the north), . This approval should not constitute approval of a specific site or development plan, since plans are still in the development stage. The approval should only address the PUD concept for the site. Recommend establishment of a citizen task force to define the long term use(s) of land along the east side of Cleveland Avenue from County Road o south to the industrial uses (south of Lydia). PF#2986 - (10/26/98) - Page 7 of 10