My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02988
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2900
>
pf_02988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:28:06 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:57:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2988
Planning Files - Type
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />residents. It is further recommended that the City enter into an agreement to <br />place a communications tower on the Water Works property in as unobtrusive a <br />manner as possible. The purchase should be funded with $700,000 from the TIF <br />bond pool which would be repaid by revenue from lease payments on the <br />communications tower. <br /> <br />2) Park Development and Redevelopment <br /> <br />A) DEVELOPMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS <br />BACKGROUND: Several new parks remain undeveloped or incomplete (Le" Langton <br />Lake, Owasso Hills, Zuettel Property). Completion of the redevelopment of Acorn Park <br />has significantly raised community expectations with regard to park amenities and <br />design. Funds to develop all parks to these high standards are not now available in the <br />Parks and Recreation Department budget. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDA nON: The City should complete development of these three <br />neighborhood parks as soon as possible. The $750,000 cost of developing these <br />parks should come from the TlF bond pool. <br /> <br />B) DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNITY PARK - LEXINGTON PARK <br />BACKGROUND: A community park serves an area larger than a neighborhood. <br />Lexington Park could be viewed as both a neighborhood and a community park <br />depending on its size and facilities. This neighborhood has waited many years for <br />completion of Lexington Park. This delay has been in part due to debate over whether <br />the entire parcel should be a park. Planning should begin immediately with <br />neighborhood input. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDA nON: The entire parcel at the comer of Lexington Avenue and <br />County Road B should be a park. The City should complete development of <br />Lexington Park as soon as feasible; the estimated cost of $350,000 should be <br />from the TIF bond pool. <br /> <br />C) DEVELOPMENT OF URBAN OR REGIONAL PARKS <br /> <br />Water Works Property <br />BACKGROUND: The Water Works Property represents a unique opportunity to <br />preserve a large biologically diverse site which will provide opportunities for increased <br />environmental awareness, interpretive programs, and hiking and skiing trails. The <br />location will provide a link between Roseville pathways and the Gateway Trail, <br />Because of its size, location and unique features, the Water Works Park would become <br />a resource for neighboring communities. <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.