My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02988
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2900
>
pf_02988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:28:06 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:57:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2988
Planning Files - Type
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />and public facilities. <br /> <br />Recreational corridors identified as fitting the definition include: <br />1) Lexington Avenue from Larpenteur Avenue to County Road 0, <br />2) County Road C from Rice Street to Cleveland Avenue, <br />3) County Road 82 from Rice Street to Cleveland Avenue, <br />4) Dale Street from Larpenteur Avenue to Lake Owasso, <br />5) Victoria Street from Larpenteur Avenue to County Road D, <br />6) Country Road 8 from Rice Street to Highway 280. <br />Each corridor links a number of reaeational and public facilities. During future <br />redevelopment along these corridors, special consideration should be given to linkage <br />to other pathways and to amenities and aesthetic elements such as benches, trees, <br />and plantings in order to create anjntegrated street scape. <br /> <br />RECOAfMENDA TION: The Lexington Corridor from Como Park to County Road D <br />should be designated as a model project corridor. A comprehensive master plan <br />should be developed and implemented on the Lexington Corridor which would <br />then serve as a prototype to be replicated on the other corridors. The Planning <br />Commission should act to implement the corridor concept in future development <br />and redevelopment efforts. <br /> <br />B) CORNERSTONE PROJECT <br />BACKGROUND: The Metropolitan Council funded Cornerstone Project identified <br />several intersections as possible redevelopment projects. Criteria for inclusion were <br />project feasibility, linkage and community impact. The intersections selected were <br />Roselawn Avenue and Lexington Avenue, Lexington Avenue and Country Road B, and <br />Hamline Avenue and County Road B. The Lexington and 8 project would encompass <br />the Lexington Park site which has not yet been fully developed. All three projects <br />would impact the development of recreational corridors. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDA nON: The comer of County Road B and Lexington Avenue <br />should be included in the Cornerstone Project because the 8.5 acres of open <br />space and the other three comers are critical to the "recreational corridor"' <br />concept developed by the Committee. The Committee believes this comer <br />(Lexington and B) is an essential gateway to the City Center Project. <br /> <br />C) PATHWAYS <br />BACKGROUND: A Pathway Committee was appointed by the city council in 1995. Its <br />recommendations for the development of a system of interconnected pathways linking <br />neighborhoods with parks and with public and private facilities is consistent with the <br />Vision of the Infrastructure Committee and with Vista 2000. Further, consistent with the <br />recreational corridor concept, the Pathway Committee envisioned integration of <br />recreational and public facilities throughout the community. The Pathway Committee <br />also recommended linkages to pathways in surrounding communities and anticipated <br />the acquisition of the Water Works Property facilitating a link to the Gateway Trail. <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />... <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.